Balancing public values during the energy transition

How can German and Dutch DSOs safeguard sustainability

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

    Abstract

    Distribution of electricity constitutes an essential link in the energy sector value chain for which Distribution System Operators (DSOs) bear the responsibility. While executing that role, DSOs are expected to take into consideration public values, such as the availability, affordability and sustainability of the infrastructure they manage.

    The energy transition causes DSOs to deal with increasingly unpredictable flows of locally generated renewable energy, requiring the use of, for instance, electricity storage or demand response, options current legislation insufficiently provides. This paper uses legal-empirical research (interviews and surveys) to demonstrate that German and Dutch DSOs increasingly struggle with the limited consideration they can give sustainability during the transition towards a smart and renewables-based energy system. DSOs experience an imbalance within the energy public value triangle. Unbalanced public values, as perceived by DSOs, are a symptom of the mismatch between the DSOs’ daily practice, shaped by the challenges of the energy transition, and existing legislation.

    This paper compares European, German, and Dutch (forthcoming) legislation intended to further the energy transition, and analyses the pros and cons of the various approaches in terms of their impact on the DSOs’ challenges. On that basis, legislative changes are recommended to clarify the role of DSOs, reduce public value tensions for DSOs, and support DSOs in a more balanced overall response to the energy transition.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)57-65
    Number of pages9
    JournalEnergy Policy
    Volume128
    Issue numberMay 2019
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2019

    Fingerprint

    distribution system
    Sustainable development
    sustainability
    Electricity
    energy
    Availability
    legislation
    electricity
    public
    infrastructure

    Keywords

    • public values, energy transition, distribution system operators, flexibility, storage, unbundling

    Cite this

    @article{17d59de78f964ffdb671c9d73c742b15,
    title = "Balancing public values during the energy transition: How can German and Dutch DSOs safeguard sustainability",
    abstract = "Distribution of electricity constitutes an essential link in the energy sector value chain for which Distribution System Operators (DSOs) bear the responsibility. While executing that role, DSOs are expected to take into consideration public values, such as the availability, affordability and sustainability of the infrastructure they manage.The energy transition causes DSOs to deal with increasingly unpredictable flows of locally generated renewable energy, requiring the use of, for instance, electricity storage or demand response, options current legislation insufficiently provides. This paper uses legal-empirical research (interviews and surveys) to demonstrate that German and Dutch DSOs increasingly struggle with the limited consideration they can give sustainability during the transition towards a smart and renewables-based energy system. DSOs experience an imbalance within the energy public value triangle. Unbalanced public values, as perceived by DSOs, are a symptom of the mismatch between the DSOs’ daily practice, shaped by the challenges of the energy transition, and existing legislation.This paper compares European, German, and Dutch (forthcoming) legislation intended to further the energy transition, and analyses the pros and cons of the various approaches in terms of their impact on the DSOs’ challenges. On that basis, legislative changes are recommended to clarify the role of DSOs, reduce public value tensions for DSOs, and support DSOs in a more balanced overall response to the energy transition.",
    keywords = "public values, energy transition, distribution system operators, flexibility, storage, unbundling",
    author = "Saskia Lavrijssen and Martha Edens",
    year = "2019",
    doi = "10.1016/j.enpol.2018.12.048",
    language = "English",
    volume = "128",
    pages = "57--65",
    journal = "Energy Policy",
    issn = "0301-4215",
    publisher = "ELSEVIER SCI LTD",
    number = "May 2019",

    }

    Balancing public values during the energy transition : How can German and Dutch DSOs safeguard sustainability. / Lavrijssen, Saskia; Edens, Martha.

    In: Energy Policy, Vol. 128, No. May 2019, 2019, p. 57-65.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Balancing public values during the energy transition

    T2 - How can German and Dutch DSOs safeguard sustainability

    AU - Lavrijssen, Saskia

    AU - Edens, Martha

    PY - 2019

    Y1 - 2019

    N2 - Distribution of electricity constitutes an essential link in the energy sector value chain for which Distribution System Operators (DSOs) bear the responsibility. While executing that role, DSOs are expected to take into consideration public values, such as the availability, affordability and sustainability of the infrastructure they manage.The energy transition causes DSOs to deal with increasingly unpredictable flows of locally generated renewable energy, requiring the use of, for instance, electricity storage or demand response, options current legislation insufficiently provides. This paper uses legal-empirical research (interviews and surveys) to demonstrate that German and Dutch DSOs increasingly struggle with the limited consideration they can give sustainability during the transition towards a smart and renewables-based energy system. DSOs experience an imbalance within the energy public value triangle. Unbalanced public values, as perceived by DSOs, are a symptom of the mismatch between the DSOs’ daily practice, shaped by the challenges of the energy transition, and existing legislation.This paper compares European, German, and Dutch (forthcoming) legislation intended to further the energy transition, and analyses the pros and cons of the various approaches in terms of their impact on the DSOs’ challenges. On that basis, legislative changes are recommended to clarify the role of DSOs, reduce public value tensions for DSOs, and support DSOs in a more balanced overall response to the energy transition.

    AB - Distribution of electricity constitutes an essential link in the energy sector value chain for which Distribution System Operators (DSOs) bear the responsibility. While executing that role, DSOs are expected to take into consideration public values, such as the availability, affordability and sustainability of the infrastructure they manage.The energy transition causes DSOs to deal with increasingly unpredictable flows of locally generated renewable energy, requiring the use of, for instance, electricity storage or demand response, options current legislation insufficiently provides. This paper uses legal-empirical research (interviews and surveys) to demonstrate that German and Dutch DSOs increasingly struggle with the limited consideration they can give sustainability during the transition towards a smart and renewables-based energy system. DSOs experience an imbalance within the energy public value triangle. Unbalanced public values, as perceived by DSOs, are a symptom of the mismatch between the DSOs’ daily practice, shaped by the challenges of the energy transition, and existing legislation.This paper compares European, German, and Dutch (forthcoming) legislation intended to further the energy transition, and analyses the pros and cons of the various approaches in terms of their impact on the DSOs’ challenges. On that basis, legislative changes are recommended to clarify the role of DSOs, reduce public value tensions for DSOs, and support DSOs in a more balanced overall response to the energy transition.

    KW - public values, energy transition, distribution system operators, flexibility, storage, unbundling

    U2 - 10.1016/j.enpol.2018.12.048

    DO - 10.1016/j.enpol.2018.12.048

    M3 - Article

    VL - 128

    SP - 57

    EP - 65

    JO - Energy Policy

    JF - Energy Policy

    SN - 0301-4215

    IS - May 2019

    ER -