Behavioral integrity for safety, priority of safety, psychological safety, and patient safety

a team-level study

H. Leroy, B. Dierynck, F. Anseel, T. Simons, J.R. Halbesleben, D. McCaughey, G.T. Savage, L. Sels

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

Abstract

This article clarifies how leader behavioral integrity for safety helps solve follower's double bind between adhering to safety protocols and speaking up about mistakes against protocols. Path modeling of survey data in 54 nursing teams showed that head nurse behavioral integrity for safety positively relates to both team priority of safety and psychological safety. In turn, team priority of safety and team psychological safety were, respectively, negatively and positively related with the number of treatment errors that were reported to head nurses. We further demonstrated an interaction effect between team priority of safety and psychological safety on reported errors such that the relationship between team priority of safety and the number of errors was stronger for higher levels of team psychological safety. Finally, we showed that both team priority of safety and team psychological safety mediated the relationship between leader behavioral integrity for safety and reported treatment errors. These results suggest that although adhering to safety protocols and admitting mistakes against those protocols show opposite relations to reported treatment errors, both are important to improving patient safety and both are fostered by leaders who walk their safety talk.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1273-1281
JournalJournal of Applied Psychology
Volume97
Issue number6
Publication statusPublished - 2012

Fingerprint

Supervisory Nursing
Team Nursing
Surveys and Questionnaires

Cite this

Leroy, H., Dierynck, B., Anseel, F., Simons, T., Halbesleben, J. R., McCaughey, D., ... Sels, L. (2012). Behavioral integrity for safety, priority of safety, psychological safety, and patient safety: a team-level study. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97(6), 1273-1281.
Leroy, H. ; Dierynck, B. ; Anseel, F. ; Simons, T. ; Halbesleben, J.R. ; McCaughey, D. ; Savage, G.T. ; Sels, L. / Behavioral integrity for safety, priority of safety, psychological safety, and patient safety : a team-level study. In: Journal of Applied Psychology. 2012 ; Vol. 97, No. 6. pp. 1273-1281.
@article{59026e1b44674a01bcd4982adede258c,
title = "Behavioral integrity for safety, priority of safety, psychological safety, and patient safety: a team-level study",
abstract = "This article clarifies how leader behavioral integrity for safety helps solve follower's double bind between adhering to safety protocols and speaking up about mistakes against protocols. Path modeling of survey data in 54 nursing teams showed that head nurse behavioral integrity for safety positively relates to both team priority of safety and psychological safety. In turn, team priority of safety and team psychological safety were, respectively, negatively and positively related with the number of treatment errors that were reported to head nurses. We further demonstrated an interaction effect between team priority of safety and psychological safety on reported errors such that the relationship between team priority of safety and the number of errors was stronger for higher levels of team psychological safety. Finally, we showed that both team priority of safety and team psychological safety mediated the relationship between leader behavioral integrity for safety and reported treatment errors. These results suggest that although adhering to safety protocols and admitting mistakes against those protocols show opposite relations to reported treatment errors, both are important to improving patient safety and both are fostered by leaders who walk their safety talk.",
author = "H. Leroy and B. Dierynck and F. Anseel and T. Simons and J.R. Halbesleben and D. McCaughey and G.T. Savage and L. Sels",
year = "2012",
language = "English",
volume = "97",
pages = "1273--1281",
journal = "Journal of Applied Psychology",
issn = "0021-9010",
publisher = "American Psychological Association",
number = "6",

}

Leroy, H, Dierynck, B, Anseel, F, Simons, T, Halbesleben, JR, McCaughey, D, Savage, GT & Sels, L 2012, 'Behavioral integrity for safety, priority of safety, psychological safety, and patient safety: a team-level study', Journal of Applied Psychology, vol. 97, no. 6, pp. 1273-1281.

Behavioral integrity for safety, priority of safety, psychological safety, and patient safety : a team-level study. / Leroy, H.; Dierynck, B.; Anseel, F.; Simons, T.; Halbesleben, J.R.; McCaughey, D.; Savage, G.T.; Sels, L.

In: Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 97, No. 6, 2012, p. 1273-1281.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Behavioral integrity for safety, priority of safety, psychological safety, and patient safety

T2 - a team-level study

AU - Leroy, H.

AU - Dierynck, B.

AU - Anseel, F.

AU - Simons, T.

AU - Halbesleben, J.R.

AU - McCaughey, D.

AU - Savage, G.T.

AU - Sels, L.

PY - 2012

Y1 - 2012

N2 - This article clarifies how leader behavioral integrity for safety helps solve follower's double bind between adhering to safety protocols and speaking up about mistakes against protocols. Path modeling of survey data in 54 nursing teams showed that head nurse behavioral integrity for safety positively relates to both team priority of safety and psychological safety. In turn, team priority of safety and team psychological safety were, respectively, negatively and positively related with the number of treatment errors that were reported to head nurses. We further demonstrated an interaction effect between team priority of safety and psychological safety on reported errors such that the relationship between team priority of safety and the number of errors was stronger for higher levels of team psychological safety. Finally, we showed that both team priority of safety and team psychological safety mediated the relationship between leader behavioral integrity for safety and reported treatment errors. These results suggest that although adhering to safety protocols and admitting mistakes against those protocols show opposite relations to reported treatment errors, both are important to improving patient safety and both are fostered by leaders who walk their safety talk.

AB - This article clarifies how leader behavioral integrity for safety helps solve follower's double bind between adhering to safety protocols and speaking up about mistakes against protocols. Path modeling of survey data in 54 nursing teams showed that head nurse behavioral integrity for safety positively relates to both team priority of safety and psychological safety. In turn, team priority of safety and team psychological safety were, respectively, negatively and positively related with the number of treatment errors that were reported to head nurses. We further demonstrated an interaction effect between team priority of safety and psychological safety on reported errors such that the relationship between team priority of safety and the number of errors was stronger for higher levels of team psychological safety. Finally, we showed that both team priority of safety and team psychological safety mediated the relationship between leader behavioral integrity for safety and reported treatment errors. These results suggest that although adhering to safety protocols and admitting mistakes against those protocols show opposite relations to reported treatment errors, both are important to improving patient safety and both are fostered by leaders who walk their safety talk.

M3 - Article

VL - 97

SP - 1273

EP - 1281

JO - Journal of Applied Psychology

JF - Journal of Applied Psychology

SN - 0021-9010

IS - 6

ER -