Belief Elicitation: A Horse Race among Truth Serums

Research output: Working paperDiscussion paperOther research output

336 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

In survey studies, probabilistic expectations about uncertain events are typically elicited by asking respondents for their introspective beliefs. If more complex procedures are feasible, beliefs can be elicited by incentive compatible revealed preference mechanisms (“truth serums”). Various mechanisms have been proposed in the literature, which differ in the degree to which they account for respondents’ deviations from expected value maximization. In this paper, we pit non-incentivized introspection against five truth serums, to elicit beliefs in a simple two-player game. We test the internal validity (additivity and predictive power for own behavior), and the external validity (predictive power for other players’ behavior, or accuracy) of each method. We find no differences among the truth serums. Beliefs from incentivized methods are better predictors of subjects’ own behavior compared to introspection. However, introspection performs equally well as the truth serums in terms of accuracy and additivity.
Original languageEnglish
Place of PublicationTilburg
PublisherEconomics
Number of pages38
Volume2011-117
Publication statusPublished - 2011

Publication series

NameCentER Discussion Paper
Volume2011-117

Keywords

  • belief measurement
  • subjective probability
  • scoring rules
  • outcome matching
  • probability matching
  • internal validity
  • external validity

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Belief Elicitation: A Horse Race among Truth Serums'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this

    Trautmann, S. T., & van de Kuilen, G. (2011). Belief Elicitation: A Horse Race among Truth Serums. (CentER Discussion Paper; Vol. 2011-117). Economics.