Beyond acquiescence and compromise: Organizational strategies in pluralizing institutional environments

Han Dahlmans*, Tobias Goessling, Patrick Kenis

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)
50 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

We set out to investigate how organizations respond to the variety of requirements as experienced in their pluralizing institutional environments. We found that, in addition to acquiescence and compromise, Dutch vocational education and training (VET) organizations predominantly respond with cooperation and coordination strategies. Extensive multistage qualitative data analysis of 26 semi-structured in-depth interviews with management team (MT) members showed that cooperation and coordination are viable and effective response strategies to face a divergent and highly differentiated set of sometimes-conflicting institutional requirements. Our study advances understanding of how organizations deploy strategic choice to arrive at their strategic responses. It offers organizational leaders, legislators, policymakers, and other constituents' insights into complex reality of how contemporary organizations actually relate to and act in their pluralizing institutional environments.
Original languageEnglish
Number of pages14
JournalEuropean Management Review
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 2023

Keywords

  • cooperation and coordination
  • institutional environments
  • institutional pluralism
  • institutional pressures
  • organizational strategies
  • strategic choice

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Beyond acquiescence and compromise: Organizational strategies in pluralizing institutional environments'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this