Beyond for or against? Multi-option alternatives to a corrective referendum

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

Abstract

Referendums commonly offer a binary choice between supporting and rejecting proposed legislation. Binary designs benefit from simplicity and guarantee a majority result, but also provoke voting biases and interpretation challenges. Referendum designs offering multiple policy alternatives provide a different approach which could alleviate binary referendum challenges whilst maintaining the aggregative benefits. Offering more than two options, however, raises new challenges in designing the referendum process and obtaining majority results. This article uses survey data collected on a corrective referendum held in the Netherlands in 2018 to compare the challenges faced by binary and multi-option referendum designs respectively. The analysis demonstrates how the multi-option design empowers voters in expressing their preferences and delivers more detailed and constructive referendum results. Building on the survey data, the article subsequently discusses the challenges of extending choice and concludes that alternative voting methods can mitigate some of these challenges.
Original languageEnglish
Article number102091
JournalElectoral Studies
Volume62
Issue numberDecember
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Dec 2019

Fingerprint

referendum
voting
guarantee
Netherlands
legislation
interpretation
trend

Keywords

  • Multi-option referendum
  • Referendum challenges
  • Binary referendum
  • Referendum design
  • Ranking
  • Approval voting

Cite this

@article{0034419c4aad47378f1c7266daf7aedb,
title = "Beyond for or against?: Multi-option alternatives to a corrective referendum",
abstract = "Referendums commonly offer a binary choice between supporting and rejecting proposed legislation. Binary designs benefit from simplicity and guarantee a majority result, but also provoke voting biases and interpretation challenges. Referendum designs offering multiple policy alternatives provide a different approach which could alleviate binary referendum challenges whilst maintaining the aggregative benefits. Offering more than two options, however, raises new challenges in designing the referendum process and obtaining majority results. This article uses survey data collected on a corrective referendum held in the Netherlands in 2018 to compare the challenges faced by binary and multi-option referendum designs respectively. The analysis demonstrates how the multi-option design empowers voters in expressing their preferences and delivers more detailed and constructive referendum results. Building on the survey data, the article subsequently discusses the challenges of extending choice and concludes that alternative voting methods can mitigate some of these challenges.",
keywords = "Multi-option referendum, Referendum challenges, Binary referendum, Referendum design, Ranking, Approval voting",
author = "Charlotte Wagenaar",
year = "2019",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.electstud.2019.102091",
language = "English",
volume = "62",
journal = "Electoral Studies",
issn = "0261-3794",
publisher = "ELSEVIER SCI LTD",
number = "December",

}

Beyond for or against? Multi-option alternatives to a corrective referendum. / Wagenaar, Charlotte.

In: Electoral Studies, Vol. 62, No. December, 102091, 01.12.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Beyond for or against?

T2 - Multi-option alternatives to a corrective referendum

AU - Wagenaar, Charlotte

PY - 2019/12/1

Y1 - 2019/12/1

N2 - Referendums commonly offer a binary choice between supporting and rejecting proposed legislation. Binary designs benefit from simplicity and guarantee a majority result, but also provoke voting biases and interpretation challenges. Referendum designs offering multiple policy alternatives provide a different approach which could alleviate binary referendum challenges whilst maintaining the aggregative benefits. Offering more than two options, however, raises new challenges in designing the referendum process and obtaining majority results. This article uses survey data collected on a corrective referendum held in the Netherlands in 2018 to compare the challenges faced by binary and multi-option referendum designs respectively. The analysis demonstrates how the multi-option design empowers voters in expressing their preferences and delivers more detailed and constructive referendum results. Building on the survey data, the article subsequently discusses the challenges of extending choice and concludes that alternative voting methods can mitigate some of these challenges.

AB - Referendums commonly offer a binary choice between supporting and rejecting proposed legislation. Binary designs benefit from simplicity and guarantee a majority result, but also provoke voting biases and interpretation challenges. Referendum designs offering multiple policy alternatives provide a different approach which could alleviate binary referendum challenges whilst maintaining the aggregative benefits. Offering more than two options, however, raises new challenges in designing the referendum process and obtaining majority results. This article uses survey data collected on a corrective referendum held in the Netherlands in 2018 to compare the challenges faced by binary and multi-option referendum designs respectively. The analysis demonstrates how the multi-option design empowers voters in expressing their preferences and delivers more detailed and constructive referendum results. Building on the survey data, the article subsequently discusses the challenges of extending choice and concludes that alternative voting methods can mitigate some of these challenges.

KW - Multi-option referendum

KW - Referendum challenges

KW - Binary referendum

KW - Referendum design

KW - Ranking

KW - Approval voting

U2 - 10.1016/j.electstud.2019.102091

DO - 10.1016/j.electstud.2019.102091

M3 - Article

VL - 62

JO - Electoral Studies

JF - Electoral Studies

SN - 0261-3794

IS - December

M1 - 102091

ER -