Beyond legitimacy

A case study in BP’s “Green Lashing”

S. Matejek, T. Goessling

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

Abstract

This paper discusses the issue of legitimacy and, in particular the processes of building, losing, and repairing environmental legitimacy in the context of the Deepwater Horizon case. Following the Deepwater Horizon catastrophe in 2010, BP plc. was accused of having set new records in the degree of divergence between its actual operations and what it had been communicating with regard to corporate responsibility. Its legitimacy crisis is here to be appraised as a case study in the discrepancy between symbolic and substantive strategies in corporate greening and its communication. A narrative analysis of BP’s “beyond petroleum”-rebranding and the “making this right”-campaign issued in response to the Gulf of Mexico disaster discusses their respective implications for (green) corporate change. Further, the question is addressed why BP’s green image endeavors were so widely accepted at first, only to find themselves dismissed as corporate greenwashing now. The study concludes that where a corporation’s “green narrative” consistently evokes established narratives, its legitimacy will be judged against narrative, rather than empirical truth. Thus, the narrative will be more willingly accepted as speaking for the issuing company’s legitimacy, irrespective of whether it reflects substantive greening or not.
Keywords: Corporate environmental responsibility, Impression management, Narrative analysis, Corporate communication, Image crisis, BP
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)571-584
JournalJournal of Business Ethics
Volume120
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2014

Fingerprint

legitimacy
narrative
corporate communication
responsibility
accused
divergence
Legitimacy
speaking
corporation
disaster
Mexico
campaign
communication
management
Responsibility
Narrative Analysis
Communication
Narrative analysis

Cite this

Matejek, S. ; Goessling, T. / Beyond legitimacy : A case study in BP’s “Green Lashing”. In: Journal of Business Ethics. 2014 ; Vol. 120, No. 4. pp. 571-584.
@article{756ef6ad0e36433b8f7c6b6fbdbc76f7,
title = "Beyond legitimacy: A case study in BP’s “Green Lashing”",
abstract = "This paper discusses the issue of legitimacy and, in particular the processes of building, losing, and repairing environmental legitimacy in the context of the Deepwater Horizon case. Following the Deepwater Horizon catastrophe in 2010, BP plc. was accused of having set new records in the degree of divergence between its actual operations and what it had been communicating with regard to corporate responsibility. Its legitimacy crisis is here to be appraised as a case study in the discrepancy between symbolic and substantive strategies in corporate greening and its communication. A narrative analysis of BP’s “beyond petroleum”-rebranding and the “making this right”-campaign issued in response to the Gulf of Mexico disaster discusses their respective implications for (green) corporate change. Further, the question is addressed why BP’s green image endeavors were so widely accepted at first, only to find themselves dismissed as corporate greenwashing now. The study concludes that where a corporation’s “green narrative” consistently evokes established narratives, its legitimacy will be judged against narrative, rather than empirical truth. Thus, the narrative will be more willingly accepted as speaking for the issuing company’s legitimacy, irrespective of whether it reflects substantive greening or not.Keywords: Corporate environmental responsibility, Impression management, Narrative analysis, Corporate communication, Image crisis, BP",
author = "S. Matejek and T. Goessling",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1007/s10551-013-2006-6",
language = "English",
volume = "120",
pages = "571--584",
journal = "Journal of Business Ethics",
issn = "0167-4544",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",
number = "4",

}

Beyond legitimacy : A case study in BP’s “Green Lashing”. / Matejek, S.; Goessling, T.

In: Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 120, No. 4, 2014, p. 571-584.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Beyond legitimacy

T2 - A case study in BP’s “Green Lashing”

AU - Matejek, S.

AU - Goessling, T.

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - This paper discusses the issue of legitimacy and, in particular the processes of building, losing, and repairing environmental legitimacy in the context of the Deepwater Horizon case. Following the Deepwater Horizon catastrophe in 2010, BP plc. was accused of having set new records in the degree of divergence between its actual operations and what it had been communicating with regard to corporate responsibility. Its legitimacy crisis is here to be appraised as a case study in the discrepancy between symbolic and substantive strategies in corporate greening and its communication. A narrative analysis of BP’s “beyond petroleum”-rebranding and the “making this right”-campaign issued in response to the Gulf of Mexico disaster discusses their respective implications for (green) corporate change. Further, the question is addressed why BP’s green image endeavors were so widely accepted at first, only to find themselves dismissed as corporate greenwashing now. The study concludes that where a corporation’s “green narrative” consistently evokes established narratives, its legitimacy will be judged against narrative, rather than empirical truth. Thus, the narrative will be more willingly accepted as speaking for the issuing company’s legitimacy, irrespective of whether it reflects substantive greening or not.Keywords: Corporate environmental responsibility, Impression management, Narrative analysis, Corporate communication, Image crisis, BP

AB - This paper discusses the issue of legitimacy and, in particular the processes of building, losing, and repairing environmental legitimacy in the context of the Deepwater Horizon case. Following the Deepwater Horizon catastrophe in 2010, BP plc. was accused of having set new records in the degree of divergence between its actual operations and what it had been communicating with regard to corporate responsibility. Its legitimacy crisis is here to be appraised as a case study in the discrepancy between symbolic and substantive strategies in corporate greening and its communication. A narrative analysis of BP’s “beyond petroleum”-rebranding and the “making this right”-campaign issued in response to the Gulf of Mexico disaster discusses their respective implications for (green) corporate change. Further, the question is addressed why BP’s green image endeavors were so widely accepted at first, only to find themselves dismissed as corporate greenwashing now. The study concludes that where a corporation’s “green narrative” consistently evokes established narratives, its legitimacy will be judged against narrative, rather than empirical truth. Thus, the narrative will be more willingly accepted as speaking for the issuing company’s legitimacy, irrespective of whether it reflects substantive greening or not.Keywords: Corporate environmental responsibility, Impression management, Narrative analysis, Corporate communication, Image crisis, BP

U2 - 10.1007/s10551-013-2006-6

DO - 10.1007/s10551-013-2006-6

M3 - Article

VL - 120

SP - 571

EP - 584

JO - Journal of Business Ethics

JF - Journal of Business Ethics

SN - 0167-4544

IS - 4

ER -