Beyond the civic-ethnic dichotomy. Investigating the structure of citizenship concepts across thirty-three countries

T. Reeskens, M. Hooghe

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

194 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The traditional distinction between civic and ethnic citizenship continues to dominate the study of citizenship concepts. In recent years, various authors have questioned the dichotomous character of these concepts. In this article, we empirically investigate the applicability of this dichotomy based on an analysis of International Social Survey Programme (ISSP) survey data across thirty-three societies. The analysis demonstrates that this dichotomous structure can indeed be detected and therefore the theoretical dichotomy can be considered as empirically valid. While ethnic citizenship refers most strongly to having national ancestry, for civic citizenship the most important criterion seems to be to obey national laws. However, the ethnic concept of citizenship can also be defined in a negative manner: for ethnic citizenship, obeying the national laws is clearly not a sufficient condition. Further analysis also reveals that the measurement of both concepts is not equivalent cross-nationally, so that findings on civic and ethnic citizenship are difficult to compare across societies.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)579-597
JournalNations and Nationalism
Volume16
Issue number4
Publication statusPublished - 2010

Fingerprint

citizenship
ISSP
Law
Civics
Citizenship
Dichotomy
society
ancestry
analysis

Cite this

@article{d0fd3f29c5e343b4a724c981afb2dfd3,
title = "Beyond the civic-ethnic dichotomy. Investigating the structure of citizenship concepts across thirty-three countries",
abstract = "The traditional distinction between civic and ethnic citizenship continues to dominate the study of citizenship concepts. In recent years, various authors have questioned the dichotomous character of these concepts. In this article, we empirically investigate the applicability of this dichotomy based on an analysis of International Social Survey Programme (ISSP) survey data across thirty-three societies. The analysis demonstrates that this dichotomous structure can indeed be detected and therefore the theoretical dichotomy can be considered as empirically valid. While ethnic citizenship refers most strongly to having national ancestry, for civic citizenship the most important criterion seems to be to obey national laws. However, the ethnic concept of citizenship can also be defined in a negative manner: for ethnic citizenship, obeying the national laws is clearly not a sufficient condition. Further analysis also reveals that the measurement of both concepts is not equivalent cross-nationally, so that findings on civic and ethnic citizenship are difficult to compare across societies.",
author = "T. Reeskens and M. Hooghe",
year = "2010",
language = "English",
volume = "16",
pages = "579--597",
journal = "Nations and Nationalism",
issn = "1469-8129",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "4",

}

Beyond the civic-ethnic dichotomy. Investigating the structure of citizenship concepts across thirty-three countries. / Reeskens, T.; Hooghe, M.

In: Nations and Nationalism, Vol. 16, No. 4, 2010, p. 579-597.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Beyond the civic-ethnic dichotomy. Investigating the structure of citizenship concepts across thirty-three countries

AU - Reeskens, T.

AU - Hooghe, M.

PY - 2010

Y1 - 2010

N2 - The traditional distinction between civic and ethnic citizenship continues to dominate the study of citizenship concepts. In recent years, various authors have questioned the dichotomous character of these concepts. In this article, we empirically investigate the applicability of this dichotomy based on an analysis of International Social Survey Programme (ISSP) survey data across thirty-three societies. The analysis demonstrates that this dichotomous structure can indeed be detected and therefore the theoretical dichotomy can be considered as empirically valid. While ethnic citizenship refers most strongly to having national ancestry, for civic citizenship the most important criterion seems to be to obey national laws. However, the ethnic concept of citizenship can also be defined in a negative manner: for ethnic citizenship, obeying the national laws is clearly not a sufficient condition. Further analysis also reveals that the measurement of both concepts is not equivalent cross-nationally, so that findings on civic and ethnic citizenship are difficult to compare across societies.

AB - The traditional distinction between civic and ethnic citizenship continues to dominate the study of citizenship concepts. In recent years, various authors have questioned the dichotomous character of these concepts. In this article, we empirically investigate the applicability of this dichotomy based on an analysis of International Social Survey Programme (ISSP) survey data across thirty-three societies. The analysis demonstrates that this dichotomous structure can indeed be detected and therefore the theoretical dichotomy can be considered as empirically valid. While ethnic citizenship refers most strongly to having national ancestry, for civic citizenship the most important criterion seems to be to obey national laws. However, the ethnic concept of citizenship can also be defined in a negative manner: for ethnic citizenship, obeying the national laws is clearly not a sufficient condition. Further analysis also reveals that the measurement of both concepts is not equivalent cross-nationally, so that findings on civic and ethnic citizenship are difficult to compare across societies.

M3 - Article

VL - 16

SP - 579

EP - 597

JO - Nations and Nationalism

JF - Nations and Nationalism

SN - 1469-8129

IS - 4

ER -