Beyond threat and uncertainty

The underpinnings of conservatism

T. Proulx, M.J. Brandt

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

Abstract

Social scientists study social categories. In recent years, an account has emerged of one particular social category, an atavistic portrayal of a cohort whose genes were selected for in a primitive stage of human history, whose behaviors are shaped by a heightened sensitivity to negative experiences, and who are characterized by relatively lower intelligence, close-mindedness and diminished capacity to detect cognitive error. This account of the social category in question—conservatives—has proliferated in the social sciences and the popular press, though to arrive at these conclusions, we suggest that researchers have had to gloss over relevant ideological dimensions within conservatism and distinctions within the negativity bias construct. Our aim with this introduction, and the special issue that follows, is to outline a more nuanced relationship between conservatism and negativity, and to examine the consequences of this atavistic portrayal for the social sciences and the general public.
KEYWORDS: conservatism, negativity bias, political neuroscience, genetic essentialism
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)313-323
JournalSocial Cognition
Volume35
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2017

Fingerprint

History

Cite this

@article{3d6d9e2343bf44cb97bf691c53c6e312,
title = "Beyond threat and uncertainty: The underpinnings of conservatism",
abstract = "Social scientists study social categories. In recent years, an account has emerged of one particular social category, an atavistic portrayal of a cohort whose genes were selected for in a primitive stage of human history, whose behaviors are shaped by a heightened sensitivity to negative experiences, and who are characterized by relatively lower intelligence, close-mindedness and diminished capacity to detect cognitive error. This account of the social category in question—conservatives—has proliferated in the social sciences and the popular press, though to arrive at these conclusions, we suggest that researchers have had to gloss over relevant ideological dimensions within conservatism and distinctions within the negativity bias construct. Our aim with this introduction, and the special issue that follows, is to outline a more nuanced relationship between conservatism and negativity, and to examine the consequences of this atavistic portrayal for the social sciences and the general public.KEYWORDS: conservatism, negativity bias, political neuroscience, genetic essentialism",
author = "T. Proulx and M.J. Brandt",
year = "2017",
doi = "10.1521/soco.2017.35.4.313",
language = "English",
volume = "35",
pages = "313--323",
journal = "Social Cognition",
issn = "0278-016X",
publisher = "Guilford Publications",
number = "4",

}

Beyond threat and uncertainty : The underpinnings of conservatism. / Proulx, T.; Brandt, M.J.

In: Social Cognition, Vol. 35, No. 4, 2017, p. 313-323.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Beyond threat and uncertainty

T2 - The underpinnings of conservatism

AU - Proulx, T.

AU - Brandt, M.J.

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - Social scientists study social categories. In recent years, an account has emerged of one particular social category, an atavistic portrayal of a cohort whose genes were selected for in a primitive stage of human history, whose behaviors are shaped by a heightened sensitivity to negative experiences, and who are characterized by relatively lower intelligence, close-mindedness and diminished capacity to detect cognitive error. This account of the social category in question—conservatives—has proliferated in the social sciences and the popular press, though to arrive at these conclusions, we suggest that researchers have had to gloss over relevant ideological dimensions within conservatism and distinctions within the negativity bias construct. Our aim with this introduction, and the special issue that follows, is to outline a more nuanced relationship between conservatism and negativity, and to examine the consequences of this atavistic portrayal for the social sciences and the general public.KEYWORDS: conservatism, negativity bias, political neuroscience, genetic essentialism

AB - Social scientists study social categories. In recent years, an account has emerged of one particular social category, an atavistic portrayal of a cohort whose genes were selected for in a primitive stage of human history, whose behaviors are shaped by a heightened sensitivity to negative experiences, and who are characterized by relatively lower intelligence, close-mindedness and diminished capacity to detect cognitive error. This account of the social category in question—conservatives—has proliferated in the social sciences and the popular press, though to arrive at these conclusions, we suggest that researchers have had to gloss over relevant ideological dimensions within conservatism and distinctions within the negativity bias construct. Our aim with this introduction, and the special issue that follows, is to outline a more nuanced relationship between conservatism and negativity, and to examine the consequences of this atavistic portrayal for the social sciences and the general public.KEYWORDS: conservatism, negativity bias, political neuroscience, genetic essentialism

U2 - 10.1521/soco.2017.35.4.313

DO - 10.1521/soco.2017.35.4.313

M3 - Article

VL - 35

SP - 313

EP - 323

JO - Social Cognition

JF - Social Cognition

SN - 0278-016X

IS - 4

ER -