Beyond victims’ mere presence

An empirical analysis of victim participation in transitional justice in Colombia

Mijke de Waardt, Sanne Weber

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

Abstract

Whereas victims’ rights and demands have gained attention in the practice and scholarship of transitional justice (TJ), victims are at best consultees and witnesses, not decision-makers. Victims’ participation as political actors, and the impact of sociopolitical participation on survivors, is still an under-researched area in TJ. This article provides an analysis of how victims’ participation is given shape in the everyday functioning of Colombia’s Victims’ Law. The Victims’ Law offers an excellent case to examine this issue, since it provides an ongoing and ambitious TJ mechanism with a detailed framework for participation. This allows for a better understanding of this phenomenon in practice, beyond the understanding of victim-centred transitional justice as the mere presence of victims. This article critically engages with victim-centred TJ theories which are based on long-held assumptions of how participation will lead to participation, ownership and citizenship. It moreover explores the impact on victims of that participation throughout the different phases of non-judicial TJ procedures. It asks whether their engagement means that TJ processes indeed respond better to victims’ needs, whether victims feel a greater ownership of these processes as a result, and whether victims even want to participate. It concludes by reflecting on the implications for victim-centred TJ, by explaining that participation should privilege genuinely participatory processes which take survivors and their agency as a starting point. This requires recognizing and building upon victims’ pre-existent internal organizational and decision-making processes and time frames, to create a more horizontal way of relating.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-20
Number of pages20
JournalJournal of Human Rights Practice
Volume2019
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 3 Apr 2019

Fingerprint

Colombia
justice
participation
Participation
Transitional Justice
Law
political actor
witness
decision-making process
privilege
decision maker
citizenship

Cite this

@article{67f9ab3d42ce489f9c7b898a6ed4d1be,
title = "Beyond victims’ mere presence: An empirical analysis of victim participation in transitional justice in Colombia",
abstract = "Whereas victims’ rights and demands have gained attention in the practice and scholarship of transitional justice (TJ), victims are at best consultees and witnesses, not decision-makers. Victims’ participation as political actors, and the impact of sociopolitical participation on survivors, is still an under-researched area in TJ. This article provides an analysis of how victims’ participation is given shape in the everyday functioning of Colombia’s Victims’ Law. The Victims’ Law offers an excellent case to examine this issue, since it provides an ongoing and ambitious TJ mechanism with a detailed framework for participation. This allows for a better understanding of this phenomenon in practice, beyond the understanding of victim-centred transitional justice as the mere presence of victims. This article critically engages with victim-centred TJ theories which are based on long-held assumptions of how participation will lead to participation, ownership and citizenship. It moreover explores the impact on victims of that participation throughout the different phases of non-judicial TJ procedures. It asks whether their engagement means that TJ processes indeed respond better to victims’ needs, whether victims feel a greater ownership of these processes as a result, and whether victims even want to participate. It concludes by reflecting on the implications for victim-centred TJ, by explaining that participation should privilege genuinely participatory processes which take survivors and their agency as a starting point. This requires recognizing and building upon victims’ pre-existent internal organizational and decision-making processes and time frames, to create a more horizontal way of relating.",
author = "{de Waardt}, Mijke and Sanne Weber",
year = "2019",
month = "4",
day = "3",
doi = "10.1093/jhuman/huz002",
language = "English",
volume = "2019",
pages = "1--20",
journal = "Journal of Human Rights Practice",
issn = "1757-9627",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",

}

Beyond victims’ mere presence : An empirical analysis of victim participation in transitional justice in Colombia. / de Waardt, Mijke; Weber, Sanne.

In: Journal of Human Rights Practice, Vol. 2019, 03.04.2019, p. 1-20.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Beyond victims’ mere presence

T2 - An empirical analysis of victim participation in transitional justice in Colombia

AU - de Waardt, Mijke

AU - Weber, Sanne

PY - 2019/4/3

Y1 - 2019/4/3

N2 - Whereas victims’ rights and demands have gained attention in the practice and scholarship of transitional justice (TJ), victims are at best consultees and witnesses, not decision-makers. Victims’ participation as political actors, and the impact of sociopolitical participation on survivors, is still an under-researched area in TJ. This article provides an analysis of how victims’ participation is given shape in the everyday functioning of Colombia’s Victims’ Law. The Victims’ Law offers an excellent case to examine this issue, since it provides an ongoing and ambitious TJ mechanism with a detailed framework for participation. This allows for a better understanding of this phenomenon in practice, beyond the understanding of victim-centred transitional justice as the mere presence of victims. This article critically engages with victim-centred TJ theories which are based on long-held assumptions of how participation will lead to participation, ownership and citizenship. It moreover explores the impact on victims of that participation throughout the different phases of non-judicial TJ procedures. It asks whether their engagement means that TJ processes indeed respond better to victims’ needs, whether victims feel a greater ownership of these processes as a result, and whether victims even want to participate. It concludes by reflecting on the implications for victim-centred TJ, by explaining that participation should privilege genuinely participatory processes which take survivors and their agency as a starting point. This requires recognizing and building upon victims’ pre-existent internal organizational and decision-making processes and time frames, to create a more horizontal way of relating.

AB - Whereas victims’ rights and demands have gained attention in the practice and scholarship of transitional justice (TJ), victims are at best consultees and witnesses, not decision-makers. Victims’ participation as political actors, and the impact of sociopolitical participation on survivors, is still an under-researched area in TJ. This article provides an analysis of how victims’ participation is given shape in the everyday functioning of Colombia’s Victims’ Law. The Victims’ Law offers an excellent case to examine this issue, since it provides an ongoing and ambitious TJ mechanism with a detailed framework for participation. This allows for a better understanding of this phenomenon in practice, beyond the understanding of victim-centred transitional justice as the mere presence of victims. This article critically engages with victim-centred TJ theories which are based on long-held assumptions of how participation will lead to participation, ownership and citizenship. It moreover explores the impact on victims of that participation throughout the different phases of non-judicial TJ procedures. It asks whether their engagement means that TJ processes indeed respond better to victims’ needs, whether victims feel a greater ownership of these processes as a result, and whether victims even want to participate. It concludes by reflecting on the implications for victim-centred TJ, by explaining that participation should privilege genuinely participatory processes which take survivors and their agency as a starting point. This requires recognizing and building upon victims’ pre-existent internal organizational and decision-making processes and time frames, to create a more horizontal way of relating.

U2 - 10.1093/jhuman/huz002

DO - 10.1093/jhuman/huz002

M3 - Article

VL - 2019

SP - 1

EP - 20

JO - Journal of Human Rights Practice

JF - Journal of Human Rights Practice

SN - 1757-9627

ER -