Abstract
Continuous norming is an increasingly popular approach to establish norms when the performance on a test is dependent on age. However, current continuous norming methods rely on a number of assumptions that are quite restrictive and may introduce bias. In this study, quantile regression was introduced as more flexible alternative. Bias and precision of quantile regression-based norming were investigated with (age-)group as covariate, varying sample sizes and score distributions, and compared with bias and precision of two other norming methods: traditional norming and mean regression-based norming. Simulations showed the norms obtained using quantile regression to be most precise in almost all conditions. Norms were nevertheless biased when the score distributions reflected a ceiling effect. Quantile regression-based norming can thus be considered a promising alternative to traditional norming and mean regression-based norming, but only if the shape of the score distribution can be expected to be close to normal.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 1735-1750 |
Journal | Assessment |
Volume | 28 |
Issue number | 6 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2021 |
Keywords
- AGE
- SAMPLE-SIZE REQUIREMENTS
- bias
- continuous norming
- precision
- quantile regression
- regression-based norming