Bias in expert product reviews

Ben Vollaard, Jan C. van Ours*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

Abstract

Many expert reviews of products such as cars, books, movies and restaurants are non -blind. Whether such reviews can be taken at face value is questionable, but hard evidence on the presence of reviewer bias is rare. This holds particularly true for conflicts of interest that are thought to be common in non-blind product reviews but are not readily observ-able: ad hoc relationships between reviewers and producers. We present a textbook case of a long-running expert product review in the food service industry for which we know the reviewer's conflict of interest: being affiliated to one particular producer. As is typical, only insiders were aware of the possible source of bias in the review. The review resembles other non-blind tests of product quality. We find evidence of a sizable bias in the review-ers' ratings. Our findings suggest that reviewers' ad hoc relationships with producers, often dismissed as 'coming with the job', can be very harmful. (c) 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY license ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ )
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)105-118
Number of pages14
JournalJournal of Economic Behavior & Organization
Volume202
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2022

Keywords

  • Expert review
  • Conflict of interest
  • Bias
  • INFORMATION
  • COMPETITION
  • OPINION
  • DEMAND

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Bias in expert product reviews'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this