Big brother watch and others v UK

Lessons from the latest Strasbourg ruling on bulk surveillance

Research output: Memorandum/expositionCase noteProfessional

Abstract

A United Kingdom masssurveillance law, allowing for bulk interception by intelligence agencies and data sharing with foreign counterparts, violated both Article 8 and Article 10 of the EuropeanConvention onHuman Rights. The EuropeanCourt of Human Rights(ECtHR) found that, inter alia, the lack of oversight of the entire selection process and the absence of any real safeguards applicable to the selection of related communications data for the examination constitute a violation of the right to privacy. Although the ECtHR did not find a violation of Article 8 in relation to intelligence data sharing, it is important that it acknowledged for the first time its importance and stressed that the minimum requirements it has developed for gathering data also apply to sharing the data.
Original languageEnglish
Number of pages10
Project No.ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0913JUD005817013
File no.58170/13, 62322/14 and 24960/15
Finished13/09/18
ApplicantEuropean Court of Human Rights
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2019

Publication series

NameEuropean Data Protection Law Review
PublisherLexxion
No.2, p. 252 -261
Volume5

Fingerprint

surveillance
human rights
right to privacy
intelligence
communications
examination
Law
lack

Cite this

van der Sloot, B., & Kosta, E., (2019). Big brother watch and others v UK: Lessons from the latest Strasbourg ruling on bulk surveillance , No. 58170/13, 62322/14 and 24960/15, No. ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0913JUD005817013 , 10 p., Sep 13, 2018. (European Data Protection Law Review; Vol. 5, No. 2, p. 252 -261). https://doi.org/10.21552/edpl/2019/2/16
van der Sloot, Bart ; Kosta, Eleni. / Big brother watch and others v UK : Lessons from the latest Strasbourg ruling on bulk surveillance . No. 58170/13, 62322/14 and 24960/15, No. ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0913JUD005817013 , 2019. 10 p., Sep 13, 2018.
@misc{b9986a701c554aeda125b1b5b3931352,
title = "Big brother watch and others v UK: Lessons from the latest Strasbourg ruling on bulk surveillance",
abstract = "A United Kingdom masssurveillance law, allowing for bulk interception by intelligence agencies and data sharing with foreign counterparts, violated both Article 8 and Article 10 of the EuropeanConvention onHuman Rights. The EuropeanCourt of Human Rights(ECtHR) found that, inter alia, the lack of oversight of the entire selection process and the absence of any real safeguards applicable to the selection of related communications data for the examination constitute a violation of the right to privacy. Although the ECtHR did not find a violation of Article 8 in relation to intelligence data sharing, it is important that it acknowledged for the first time its importance and stressed that the minimum requirements it has developed for gathering data also apply to sharing the data.",
author = "{van der Sloot}, Bart and Eleni Kosta",
year = "2019",
doi = "10.21552/edpl/2019/2/16",
language = "English",
series = "European Data Protection Law Review",
publisher = "Lexxion",
number = "2, p. 252 -261",

}

van der Sloot, B & Kosta, E 2019, 'Big brother watch and others v UK: Lessons from the latest Strasbourg ruling on bulk surveillance ', no. 58170/13, 62322/14 and 24960/15, No. ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0913JUD005817013 , 10 p., Sep 13, 2018. European Data Protection Law Review, no. 2, p. 252 -261, vol. 5. https://doi.org/10.21552/edpl/2019/2/16

Big brother watch and others v UK : Lessons from the latest Strasbourg ruling on bulk surveillance . / van der Sloot, Bart; Kosta, Eleni.

No. 58170/13, 62322/14 and 24960/15, No. ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0913JUD005817013 , 2019. 10 p., Sep 13, 2018. (European Data Protection Law Review; Vol. 5, No. 2, p. 252 -261).

Research output: Memorandum/expositionCase noteProfessional

TY - GEN

T1 - Big brother watch and others v UK

T2 - Lessons from the latest Strasbourg ruling on bulk surveillance

AU - van der Sloot, Bart

AU - Kosta, Eleni

PY - 2019

Y1 - 2019

N2 - A United Kingdom masssurveillance law, allowing for bulk interception by intelligence agencies and data sharing with foreign counterparts, violated both Article 8 and Article 10 of the EuropeanConvention onHuman Rights. The EuropeanCourt of Human Rights(ECtHR) found that, inter alia, the lack of oversight of the entire selection process and the absence of any real safeguards applicable to the selection of related communications data for the examination constitute a violation of the right to privacy. Although the ECtHR did not find a violation of Article 8 in relation to intelligence data sharing, it is important that it acknowledged for the first time its importance and stressed that the minimum requirements it has developed for gathering data also apply to sharing the data.

AB - A United Kingdom masssurveillance law, allowing for bulk interception by intelligence agencies and data sharing with foreign counterparts, violated both Article 8 and Article 10 of the EuropeanConvention onHuman Rights. The EuropeanCourt of Human Rights(ECtHR) found that, inter alia, the lack of oversight of the entire selection process and the absence of any real safeguards applicable to the selection of related communications data for the examination constitute a violation of the right to privacy. Although the ECtHR did not find a violation of Article 8 in relation to intelligence data sharing, it is important that it acknowledged for the first time its importance and stressed that the minimum requirements it has developed for gathering data also apply to sharing the data.

U2 - 10.21552/edpl/2019/2/16

DO - 10.21552/edpl/2019/2/16

M3 - Case note

T3 - European Data Protection Law Review

ER -

van der Sloot B, Kosta E. Big brother watch and others v UK: Lessons from the latest Strasbourg ruling on bulk surveillance . No. 58170/13, 62322/14 and 24960/15, No. ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0913JUD005817013 , 2019. 10 p., Sep 13, 2018. (European Data Protection Law Review; 2, p. 252 -261). https://doi.org/10.21552/edpl/2019/2/16