Big data analytics and international negotiations: Sentiment analysis of Brexit negotiating outcomes

Elena Georgiadou, Spyros Angelopoulos, Helen Drake

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

Abstract

We introduce Big Data Analytics (BDA) and Sentiment Analysis (SA) to the study of international negotiations, through an application to the case of the UK-EU Brexit negotiations and the use of Twitter user sentiment. We show that SA of tweets has potential as a real-time barometer of public sentiment towards negotiating outcomes for government decision-making. Despite the increasing need for information on collective preferences regarding possible negotiating outcomes, negotiators have been slow to capitalise on BDA. Through SA on a corpus of 13,018,367 tweets on defined Brexit hashtags, we illustrate how SA can provide a platform for decision-makers engaged in international negotiations to grasp collective preferences. We show that BDA and SA can enhance decision-making and strategy in public policy and negotiation contexts of the magnitude of Brexit. Our findings indicate that the preferred or least preferred Brexit outcomes could have been inferred by the emotions expressed by Twitter users. We argue that BDA can be a mechanism to map the different options available to decision-makers and bring insights to and inform their decision-making. Our work, thereby, proposes SA as part of the international negotiation toolbox to remedy for the existing informational gap between decision makers and citizens’ preferred outcomes.
Original languageEnglish
Number of pages10
JournalInternational Journal of Information Management
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - Dec 2019

Fingerprint

Decision making
decision maker
twitter
Barometers
decision making
remedies
Big data
public policy
emotion
EU
citizen

Keywords

  • Big data analytics
  • Sentiment analysis
  • International negotiations
  • Brexit
  • Decision making
  • Policy making

Cite this

@article{a006e9a6737d404b902a6fdfdaff36a0,
title = "Big data analytics and international negotiations: Sentiment analysis of Brexit negotiating outcomes",
abstract = "We introduce Big Data Analytics (BDA) and Sentiment Analysis (SA) to the study of international negotiations, through an application to the case of the UK-EU Brexit negotiations and the use of Twitter user sentiment. We show that SA of tweets has potential as a real-time barometer of public sentiment towards negotiating outcomes for government decision-making. Despite the increasing need for information on collective preferences regarding possible negotiating outcomes, negotiators have been slow to capitalise on BDA. Through SA on a corpus of 13,018,367 tweets on defined Brexit hashtags, we illustrate how SA can provide a platform for decision-makers engaged in international negotiations to grasp collective preferences. We show that BDA and SA can enhance decision-making and strategy in public policy and negotiation contexts of the magnitude of Brexit. Our findings indicate that the preferred or least preferred Brexit outcomes could have been inferred by the emotions expressed by Twitter users. We argue that BDA can be a mechanism to map the different options available to decision-makers and bring insights to and inform their decision-making. Our work, thereby, proposes SA as part of the international negotiation toolbox to remedy for the existing informational gap between decision makers and citizens’ preferred outcomes.",
keywords = "Big data analytics, Sentiment analysis, International negotiations, Brexit, Decision making, Policy making",
author = "Elena Georgiadou and Spyros Angelopoulos and Helen Drake",
year = "2019",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.102048",
language = "English",
journal = "International Journal of Information Management",
issn = "0268-4012",
publisher = "Butterworth Scientific",

}

Big data analytics and international negotiations: Sentiment analysis of Brexit negotiating outcomes. / Georgiadou, Elena; Angelopoulos, Spyros; Drake, Helen.

In: International Journal of Information Management, 12.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Big data analytics and international negotiations: Sentiment analysis of Brexit negotiating outcomes

AU - Georgiadou, Elena

AU - Angelopoulos, Spyros

AU - Drake, Helen

PY - 2019/12

Y1 - 2019/12

N2 - We introduce Big Data Analytics (BDA) and Sentiment Analysis (SA) to the study of international negotiations, through an application to the case of the UK-EU Brexit negotiations and the use of Twitter user sentiment. We show that SA of tweets has potential as a real-time barometer of public sentiment towards negotiating outcomes for government decision-making. Despite the increasing need for information on collective preferences regarding possible negotiating outcomes, negotiators have been slow to capitalise on BDA. Through SA on a corpus of 13,018,367 tweets on defined Brexit hashtags, we illustrate how SA can provide a platform for decision-makers engaged in international negotiations to grasp collective preferences. We show that BDA and SA can enhance decision-making and strategy in public policy and negotiation contexts of the magnitude of Brexit. Our findings indicate that the preferred or least preferred Brexit outcomes could have been inferred by the emotions expressed by Twitter users. We argue that BDA can be a mechanism to map the different options available to decision-makers and bring insights to and inform their decision-making. Our work, thereby, proposes SA as part of the international negotiation toolbox to remedy for the existing informational gap between decision makers and citizens’ preferred outcomes.

AB - We introduce Big Data Analytics (BDA) and Sentiment Analysis (SA) to the study of international negotiations, through an application to the case of the UK-EU Brexit negotiations and the use of Twitter user sentiment. We show that SA of tweets has potential as a real-time barometer of public sentiment towards negotiating outcomes for government decision-making. Despite the increasing need for information on collective preferences regarding possible negotiating outcomes, negotiators have been slow to capitalise on BDA. Through SA on a corpus of 13,018,367 tweets on defined Brexit hashtags, we illustrate how SA can provide a platform for decision-makers engaged in international negotiations to grasp collective preferences. We show that BDA and SA can enhance decision-making and strategy in public policy and negotiation contexts of the magnitude of Brexit. Our findings indicate that the preferred or least preferred Brexit outcomes could have been inferred by the emotions expressed by Twitter users. We argue that BDA can be a mechanism to map the different options available to decision-makers and bring insights to and inform their decision-making. Our work, thereby, proposes SA as part of the international negotiation toolbox to remedy for the existing informational gap between decision makers and citizens’ preferred outcomes.

KW - Big data analytics

KW - Sentiment analysis

KW - International negotiations

KW - Brexit

KW - Decision making

KW - Policy making

U2 - 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.102048

DO - 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.102048

M3 - Article

JO - International Journal of Information Management

JF - International Journal of Information Management

SN - 0268-4012

ER -