Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Big Data and the Illusion of Choice: Comparing the Evolution of India’s Aadhaar and China’s Social Credit System as Technosocial Discourses

  • Saif Shahin*
  • , Pei Zheng
  • *Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

    Abstract

    India and China have launched enormous projects aimed at collecting vital personal information regarding their billion-plus populations and building the world’s biggest data sets in the process. However, both Aadhaar in India and the Social Credit System in China are controversial and raise a plethora of political and ethical concerns. The governments claim that participation in these projects is voluntary, even as they link vital services to citizens registering with these projects. In this study, we analyze how the news media in India and China—crucial data intermediaries that shape public perceptions on data and technological practices—framed these projects since their inception. Topic modeling suggests news coverage in both nations disregards the public interest and focuses largely on how businesses can benefit from them. The media, institutionally and ideologically linked with governments and corporations, show little concern with violations of privacy and mass surveillance that these projects could lead to. We argue that this renders citizens structurally incapable of making a meaningful “choice” about whether or not to participate in such projects. Implications for various stakeholders are discussed.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)25-41
    JournalSocial Science Computer Review
    Volume38
    Issue number1
    Publication statusPublished - 2020

    Keywords

    • Aadhaar
    • Social Credit System
    • Media
    • Privacy
    • Surveillance
    • Data

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Big Data and the Illusion of Choice: Comparing the Evolution of India’s Aadhaar and China’s Social Credit System as Technosocial Discourses'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this