Boarding Neurath's Boat: The Early Development of Quine's Naturalism

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

Abstract

W.V. Quine is arguably the intellectual father of contemporary naturalism, the idea that there is no distinctively philosophical perspective on reality. Yet even though Quine has always been a science-minded philosopher, he did not adopt a fully naturalistic perspective until the early 1950s. In this paper, I reconstruct the genesis of Quine’s ideas on the relation between science and philosophy. Scrutinizing his unpublished papers and notebooks, I examine Quine’s development in the first decades of his career. After identifying three commitments supporting his naturalism viz. empiricism, holism, and realism I piece together the evolution of Quine’s position by examining the origins of these commitments one by one, showing how his early views gradually evolved into the mature naturalistic position that would have such an enormous impact on post-war analytic philosophy.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)317-342
JournalJournal of the History of Philosophy
Volume55
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2017

Fingerprint

Boats
Naturalism
Philosopher
Analytic philosophy
Genesis
Notebook
W. V. O. Quine
1950s
Holism
Empiricism
Realism
Philosophy

Cite this

@article{7437aa2e928d4c9cbcdfe318b1a35f1b,
title = "Boarding Neurath's Boat: The Early Development of Quine's Naturalism",
abstract = "W.V. Quine is arguably the intellectual father of contemporary naturalism, the idea that there is no distinctively philosophical perspective on reality. Yet even though Quine has always been a science-minded philosopher, he did not adopt a fully naturalistic perspective until the early 1950s. In this paper, I reconstruct the genesis of Quine’s ideas on the relation between science and philosophy. Scrutinizing his unpublished papers and notebooks, I examine Quine’s development in the first decades of his career. After identifying three commitments supporting his naturalism viz. empiricism, holism, and realism I piece together the evolution of Quine’s position by examining the origins of these commitments one by one, showing how his early views gradually evolved into the mature naturalistic position that would have such an enormous impact on post-war analytic philosophy.",
author = "Sander Verhaegh",
year = "2017",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1353/hph.2017.0031",
language = "English",
volume = "55",
pages = "317--342",
journal = "Journal of the History of Philosophy",
issn = "0022-5053",
publisher = "Johns Hopkins University Press",
number = "2",

}

Boarding Neurath's Boat : The Early Development of Quine's Naturalism. / Verhaegh, Sander.

In: Journal of the History of Philosophy, Vol. 55, No. 2, 04.2017, p. 317-342.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Boarding Neurath's Boat

T2 - The Early Development of Quine's Naturalism

AU - Verhaegh, Sander

PY - 2017/4

Y1 - 2017/4

N2 - W.V. Quine is arguably the intellectual father of contemporary naturalism, the idea that there is no distinctively philosophical perspective on reality. Yet even though Quine has always been a science-minded philosopher, he did not adopt a fully naturalistic perspective until the early 1950s. In this paper, I reconstruct the genesis of Quine’s ideas on the relation between science and philosophy. Scrutinizing his unpublished papers and notebooks, I examine Quine’s development in the first decades of his career. After identifying three commitments supporting his naturalism viz. empiricism, holism, and realism I piece together the evolution of Quine’s position by examining the origins of these commitments one by one, showing how his early views gradually evolved into the mature naturalistic position that would have such an enormous impact on post-war analytic philosophy.

AB - W.V. Quine is arguably the intellectual father of contemporary naturalism, the idea that there is no distinctively philosophical perspective on reality. Yet even though Quine has always been a science-minded philosopher, he did not adopt a fully naturalistic perspective until the early 1950s. In this paper, I reconstruct the genesis of Quine’s ideas on the relation between science and philosophy. Scrutinizing his unpublished papers and notebooks, I examine Quine’s development in the first decades of his career. After identifying three commitments supporting his naturalism viz. empiricism, holism, and realism I piece together the evolution of Quine’s position by examining the origins of these commitments one by one, showing how his early views gradually evolved into the mature naturalistic position that would have such an enormous impact on post-war analytic philosophy.

U2 - 10.1353/hph.2017.0031

DO - 10.1353/hph.2017.0031

M3 - Article

VL - 55

SP - 317

EP - 342

JO - Journal of the History of Philosophy

JF - Journal of the History of Philosophy

SN - 0022-5053

IS - 2

ER -