Bounding Uncertainty: The Uses of Analogical Abduction in Entrepreneurship

Anastasia Sergeeva, Akhil Bhardwaj, D. Dimov

Research output: Working paperDiscussion paperOther research output

4 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Conceptualizing entrepreneurship as problem-solving has shed light on how problems are solved through entrepreneurial ventures. This approach presupposes that problems objectively exist, an assumption that is valid for the world of Knightian risk, in which categorization is possible. In the current study, we adopt the ontological stance of Knightian uncertainty, in which a priori categories cannot be assumed, and therefore problems do not objectively exist. We posit that in the world of Knightian uncertainty entrepreneurs who perceive certain situations as unsatisfactory but remediable engage in problematization which yields problem statements. These problem statements are operationalized to form the basis of entrepreneurial action aimed at remedying dissatisfaction. We submit that to problematize, entrepreneurs engage in analogical abduction, which allows them to develop problem statements by treating target domains replete with Knightian uncertainty as if they were similar to familiar source domains. Such conjectures are selected based on the likeness of relevant attributes between the source and target domains, aid entrepreneurs in bounding uncertainty, and guide entrepreneurial action. Entrepreneurs adopt positive feedback of entrepreneurial action as a rule to guide future action under similar circumstances, while negative feedback leads them to recalibrate problem statements and modify further action. We illustrate this process using the empirical vignette of Starbucks.
Original languageEnglish
Place of PublicationTilburg
PublisherCentER, Center for Economic Research
Number of pages31
Volume2020-002
Publication statusPublished - 9 Jan 2020

Publication series

NameCentER Discussion Paper
Volume2020-002

Fingerprint

Uncertainty
Abduction
Entrepreneurship
Entrepreneurs
Knightian uncertainty
Entrepreneurial ventures
Positive feedback
Dissatisfaction
Vignettes
Problem solving
Negative feedback

Keywords

  • Knightian uncertainty
  • problem solving
  • analogical abduction
  • entrepreneural reasoning

Cite this

Sergeeva, A., Bhardwaj, A., & Dimov, D. (2020). Bounding Uncertainty: The Uses of Analogical Abduction in Entrepreneurship. (CentER Discussion Paper; Vol. 2020-002). Tilburg: CentER, Center for Economic Research.
Sergeeva, Anastasia ; Bhardwaj, Akhil ; Dimov, D. / Bounding Uncertainty : The Uses of Analogical Abduction in Entrepreneurship. Tilburg : CentER, Center for Economic Research, 2020. (CentER Discussion Paper).
@techreport{6cc5a40c6f0349e7b3bc12c27205524c,
title = "Bounding Uncertainty: The Uses of Analogical Abduction in Entrepreneurship",
abstract = "Conceptualizing entrepreneurship as problem-solving has shed light on how problems are solved through entrepreneurial ventures. This approach presupposes that problems objectively exist, an assumption that is valid for the world of Knightian risk, in which categorization is possible. In the current study, we adopt the ontological stance of Knightian uncertainty, in which a priori categories cannot be assumed, and therefore problems do not objectively exist. We posit that in the world of Knightian uncertainty entrepreneurs who perceive certain situations as unsatisfactory but remediable engage in problematization which yields problem statements. These problem statements are operationalized to form the basis of entrepreneurial action aimed at remedying dissatisfaction. We submit that to problematize, entrepreneurs engage in analogical abduction, which allows them to develop problem statements by treating target domains replete with Knightian uncertainty as if they were similar to familiar source domains. Such conjectures are selected based on the likeness of relevant attributes between the source and target domains, aid entrepreneurs in bounding uncertainty, and guide entrepreneurial action. Entrepreneurs adopt positive feedback of entrepreneurial action as a rule to guide future action under similar circumstances, while negative feedback leads them to recalibrate problem statements and modify further action. We illustrate this process using the empirical vignette of Starbucks.",
keywords = "Knightian uncertainty, problem solving, analogical abduction, entrepreneural reasoning",
author = "Anastasia Sergeeva and Akhil Bhardwaj and D. Dimov",
note = "CentER Discussion Paper Nr. 2020-002",
year = "2020",
month = "1",
day = "9",
language = "English",
volume = "2020-002",
series = "CentER Discussion Paper",
publisher = "CentER, Center for Economic Research",
type = "WorkingPaper",
institution = "CentER, Center for Economic Research",

}

Sergeeva, A, Bhardwaj, A & Dimov, D 2020 'Bounding Uncertainty: The Uses of Analogical Abduction in Entrepreneurship' CentER Discussion Paper, vol. 2020-002, CentER, Center for Economic Research, Tilburg.

Bounding Uncertainty : The Uses of Analogical Abduction in Entrepreneurship. / Sergeeva, Anastasia; Bhardwaj, Akhil; Dimov, D.

Tilburg : CentER, Center for Economic Research, 2020. (CentER Discussion Paper; Vol. 2020-002).

Research output: Working paperDiscussion paperOther research output

TY - UNPB

T1 - Bounding Uncertainty

T2 - The Uses of Analogical Abduction in Entrepreneurship

AU - Sergeeva, Anastasia

AU - Bhardwaj, Akhil

AU - Dimov, D.

N1 - CentER Discussion Paper Nr. 2020-002

PY - 2020/1/9

Y1 - 2020/1/9

N2 - Conceptualizing entrepreneurship as problem-solving has shed light on how problems are solved through entrepreneurial ventures. This approach presupposes that problems objectively exist, an assumption that is valid for the world of Knightian risk, in which categorization is possible. In the current study, we adopt the ontological stance of Knightian uncertainty, in which a priori categories cannot be assumed, and therefore problems do not objectively exist. We posit that in the world of Knightian uncertainty entrepreneurs who perceive certain situations as unsatisfactory but remediable engage in problematization which yields problem statements. These problem statements are operationalized to form the basis of entrepreneurial action aimed at remedying dissatisfaction. We submit that to problematize, entrepreneurs engage in analogical abduction, which allows them to develop problem statements by treating target domains replete with Knightian uncertainty as if they were similar to familiar source domains. Such conjectures are selected based on the likeness of relevant attributes between the source and target domains, aid entrepreneurs in bounding uncertainty, and guide entrepreneurial action. Entrepreneurs adopt positive feedback of entrepreneurial action as a rule to guide future action under similar circumstances, while negative feedback leads them to recalibrate problem statements and modify further action. We illustrate this process using the empirical vignette of Starbucks.

AB - Conceptualizing entrepreneurship as problem-solving has shed light on how problems are solved through entrepreneurial ventures. This approach presupposes that problems objectively exist, an assumption that is valid for the world of Knightian risk, in which categorization is possible. In the current study, we adopt the ontological stance of Knightian uncertainty, in which a priori categories cannot be assumed, and therefore problems do not objectively exist. We posit that in the world of Knightian uncertainty entrepreneurs who perceive certain situations as unsatisfactory but remediable engage in problematization which yields problem statements. These problem statements are operationalized to form the basis of entrepreneurial action aimed at remedying dissatisfaction. We submit that to problematize, entrepreneurs engage in analogical abduction, which allows them to develop problem statements by treating target domains replete with Knightian uncertainty as if they were similar to familiar source domains. Such conjectures are selected based on the likeness of relevant attributes between the source and target domains, aid entrepreneurs in bounding uncertainty, and guide entrepreneurial action. Entrepreneurs adopt positive feedback of entrepreneurial action as a rule to guide future action under similar circumstances, while negative feedback leads them to recalibrate problem statements and modify further action. We illustrate this process using the empirical vignette of Starbucks.

KW - Knightian uncertainty

KW - problem solving

KW - analogical abduction

KW - entrepreneural reasoning

M3 - Discussion paper

VL - 2020-002

T3 - CentER Discussion Paper

BT - Bounding Uncertainty

PB - CentER, Center for Economic Research

CY - Tilburg

ER -

Sergeeva A, Bhardwaj A, Dimov D. Bounding Uncertainty: The Uses of Analogical Abduction in Entrepreneurship. Tilburg: CentER, Center for Economic Research. 2020 Jan 9. (CentER Discussion Paper).