BS in the boardroom: Benevolent sexism and board chair orientations

Abbie G. Oliver, Ryan Krause*, John R. Busenbark, Matias Kalm

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

Abstract

Research Summary: Though research has focused on the ascent and acceptance of female CEOs, the post-promotion circumstances female CEOs face remain unclear. In this study, we focus on a critical post-promotion circumstance: the board chair–CEO relationship. Drawing on the gender stereotype literature, agency theory, and stewardship theory, we posit that firms appointing a female CEO are more likely to adopt a collaboration board chair orientation and less likely to adopt a control orientation. We further predict this effect is attenuated by female board representation. Using a sample of new S&P 1500 CEOs, we find support for our predictions regarding the collaboration orientation but not the control orientation. This research provides some evidence of benevolent sexism in the boardroom, with female directors acting as a countervailing influence. Managerial Summary: Whereas the notion that females encounter a glass ceiling on their path toward CEO is well documented, the conditions female CEOs encounter after promotion are less understood. The relationship between the board chair and the CEO is one important post-promotion condition. Board chairs can focus on monitoring and/or working together with the CEO. We suggest board chairs are more likely to work in close collaboration with female CEOs than with male CEOs. We attribute this to benevolent sexism, which explains that board chairs are more likely to collaborate with female CEOs because they view females as more conducive to, and in need of, this type of relationship. We also suggest this benevolent sexism is less prevalent when there are more females on the board.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)113-130
JournalStrategic Management Journal
Volume39
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2018
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Chief executive officer
Sexism
Glass ceiling
Prediction
Monitoring
Agency theory
Acceptance
Stewardship theory
Gender stereotypes

Keywords

  • CEO gender
  • agency theory
  • board chair orientation
  • corporate governance
  • stewardship theory

Cite this

Oliver, Abbie G. ; Krause, Ryan ; Busenbark, John R. ; Kalm, Matias. / BS in the boardroom: Benevolent sexism and board chair orientations. In: Strategic Management Journal. 2018 ; Vol. 39, No. 1. pp. 113-130.
@article{19854bef0d3b47fb9d08eb60e298575a,
title = "BS in the boardroom: Benevolent sexism and board chair orientations",
abstract = "Research Summary: Though research has focused on the ascent and acceptance of female CEOs, the post-promotion circumstances female CEOs face remain unclear. In this study, we focus on a critical post-promotion circumstance: the board chair–CEO relationship. Drawing on the gender stereotype literature, agency theory, and stewardship theory, we posit that firms appointing a female CEO are more likely to adopt a collaboration board chair orientation and less likely to adopt a control orientation. We further predict this effect is attenuated by female board representation. Using a sample of new S&P 1500 CEOs, we find support for our predictions regarding the collaboration orientation but not the control orientation. This research provides some evidence of benevolent sexism in the boardroom, with female directors acting as a countervailing influence. Managerial Summary: Whereas the notion that females encounter a glass ceiling on their path toward CEO is well documented, the conditions female CEOs encounter after promotion are less understood. The relationship between the board chair and the CEO is one important post-promotion condition. Board chairs can focus on monitoring and/or working together with the CEO. We suggest board chairs are more likely to work in close collaboration with female CEOs than with male CEOs. We attribute this to benevolent sexism, which explains that board chairs are more likely to collaborate with female CEOs because they view females as more conducive to, and in need of, this type of relationship. We also suggest this benevolent sexism is less prevalent when there are more females on the board.",
keywords = "CEO gender, agency theory, board chair orientation, corporate governance, stewardship theory",
author = "Oliver, {Abbie G.} and Ryan Krause and Busenbark, {John R.} and Matias Kalm",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1002/smj.2698",
language = "English",
volume = "39",
pages = "113--130",
journal = "Strategic Management Journal",
issn = "0143-2095",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "1",

}

BS in the boardroom: Benevolent sexism and board chair orientations. / Oliver, Abbie G.; Krause, Ryan; Busenbark, John R.; Kalm, Matias.

In: Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 39, No. 1, 01.01.2018, p. 113-130.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - BS in the boardroom: Benevolent sexism and board chair orientations

AU - Oliver, Abbie G.

AU - Krause, Ryan

AU - Busenbark, John R.

AU - Kalm, Matias

PY - 2018/1/1

Y1 - 2018/1/1

N2 - Research Summary: Though research has focused on the ascent and acceptance of female CEOs, the post-promotion circumstances female CEOs face remain unclear. In this study, we focus on a critical post-promotion circumstance: the board chair–CEO relationship. Drawing on the gender stereotype literature, agency theory, and stewardship theory, we posit that firms appointing a female CEO are more likely to adopt a collaboration board chair orientation and less likely to adopt a control orientation. We further predict this effect is attenuated by female board representation. Using a sample of new S&P 1500 CEOs, we find support for our predictions regarding the collaboration orientation but not the control orientation. This research provides some evidence of benevolent sexism in the boardroom, with female directors acting as a countervailing influence. Managerial Summary: Whereas the notion that females encounter a glass ceiling on their path toward CEO is well documented, the conditions female CEOs encounter after promotion are less understood. The relationship between the board chair and the CEO is one important post-promotion condition. Board chairs can focus on monitoring and/or working together with the CEO. We suggest board chairs are more likely to work in close collaboration with female CEOs than with male CEOs. We attribute this to benevolent sexism, which explains that board chairs are more likely to collaborate with female CEOs because they view females as more conducive to, and in need of, this type of relationship. We also suggest this benevolent sexism is less prevalent when there are more females on the board.

AB - Research Summary: Though research has focused on the ascent and acceptance of female CEOs, the post-promotion circumstances female CEOs face remain unclear. In this study, we focus on a critical post-promotion circumstance: the board chair–CEO relationship. Drawing on the gender stereotype literature, agency theory, and stewardship theory, we posit that firms appointing a female CEO are more likely to adopt a collaboration board chair orientation and less likely to adopt a control orientation. We further predict this effect is attenuated by female board representation. Using a sample of new S&P 1500 CEOs, we find support for our predictions regarding the collaboration orientation but not the control orientation. This research provides some evidence of benevolent sexism in the boardroom, with female directors acting as a countervailing influence. Managerial Summary: Whereas the notion that females encounter a glass ceiling on their path toward CEO is well documented, the conditions female CEOs encounter after promotion are less understood. The relationship between the board chair and the CEO is one important post-promotion condition. Board chairs can focus on monitoring and/or working together with the CEO. We suggest board chairs are more likely to work in close collaboration with female CEOs than with male CEOs. We attribute this to benevolent sexism, which explains that board chairs are more likely to collaborate with female CEOs because they view females as more conducive to, and in need of, this type of relationship. We also suggest this benevolent sexism is less prevalent when there are more females on the board.

KW - CEO gender

KW - agency theory

KW - board chair orientation

KW - corporate governance

KW - stewardship theory

U2 - 10.1002/smj.2698

DO - 10.1002/smj.2698

M3 - Article

VL - 39

SP - 113

EP - 130

JO - Strategic Management Journal

JF - Strategic Management Journal

SN - 0143-2095

IS - 1

ER -