Can decision transparency increase citizen trust in regulatory agencies?

Evidence from a representative survey experiment

Stephan Grimmelikhuijsen, Feie J. Herkes, Ian Leistikow, Jos Verkroost, Femke de Vries, Wilte G. Zeilstra

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

Abstract

Decision transparency is often proposed as a way to maintain or even increase citizen trust, yet this assumption is still untested in the context of regulatory agencies. We test the effect of transparency of a typical decision tradeoff in regulatory enforcement: granting forbearance or imposing a sanction. We employed a representative survey experiment (n = 1,546) in which we test the effect of transparency in general (providing information about a decision or not) and the effect of specific types of transparency (process or rationale transparency). We do this for agencies supervising financial markets, education, and health care. We find that overall decision transparency significantly increases citizen trust in only two of the three agencies. Rationale transparency has a more pronounced positive effect only for the Education Inspectorate. We conclude that the overall effect of decision transparency is positive but that the nature of the regulatory domain may weaken or strengthen this effect.
Original languageEnglish
JournalRegulation & Governance
Publication statusPublished - 30 Sep 2019

Fingerprint

transparency
citizen
experiment
evidence
financial market
sanction
education
health care

Cite this

Grimmelikhuijsen, Stephan ; Herkes, Feie J. ; Leistikow, Ian ; Verkroost, Jos ; de Vries, Femke ; Zeilstra, Wilte G. / Can decision transparency increase citizen trust in regulatory agencies? Evidence from a representative survey experiment. In: Regulation & Governance. 2019.
@article{d9c222f09b8a415fb942426305f9d8fb,
title = "Can decision transparency increase citizen trust in regulatory agencies?: Evidence from a representative survey experiment",
abstract = "Decision transparency is often proposed as a way to maintain or even increase citizen trust, yet this assumption is still untested in the context of regulatory agencies. We test the effect of transparency of a typical decision tradeoff in regulatory enforcement: granting forbearance or imposing a sanction. We employed a representative survey experiment (n = 1,546) in which we test the effect of transparency in general (providing information about a decision or not) and the effect of specific types of transparency (process or rationale transparency). We do this for agencies supervising financial markets, education, and health care. We find that overall decision transparency significantly increases citizen trust in only two of the three agencies. Rationale transparency has a more pronounced positive effect only for the Education Inspectorate. We conclude that the overall effect of decision transparency is positive but that the nature of the regulatory domain may weaken or strengthen this effect.",
author = "Stephan Grimmelikhuijsen and Herkes, {Feie J.} and Ian Leistikow and Jos Verkroost and {de Vries}, Femke and Zeilstra, {Wilte G.}",
year = "2019",
month = "9",
day = "30",
language = "English",
journal = "Regulation & Governance",
issn = "1748-5983",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",

}

Can decision transparency increase citizen trust in regulatory agencies? Evidence from a representative survey experiment. / Grimmelikhuijsen, Stephan; Herkes, Feie J.; Leistikow, Ian; Verkroost, Jos; de Vries, Femke; Zeilstra, Wilte G.

In: Regulation & Governance, 30.09.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Can decision transparency increase citizen trust in regulatory agencies?

T2 - Evidence from a representative survey experiment

AU - Grimmelikhuijsen, Stephan

AU - Herkes, Feie J.

AU - Leistikow, Ian

AU - Verkroost, Jos

AU - de Vries, Femke

AU - Zeilstra, Wilte G.

PY - 2019/9/30

Y1 - 2019/9/30

N2 - Decision transparency is often proposed as a way to maintain or even increase citizen trust, yet this assumption is still untested in the context of regulatory agencies. We test the effect of transparency of a typical decision tradeoff in regulatory enforcement: granting forbearance or imposing a sanction. We employed a representative survey experiment (n = 1,546) in which we test the effect of transparency in general (providing information about a decision or not) and the effect of specific types of transparency (process or rationale transparency). We do this for agencies supervising financial markets, education, and health care. We find that overall decision transparency significantly increases citizen trust in only two of the three agencies. Rationale transparency has a more pronounced positive effect only for the Education Inspectorate. We conclude that the overall effect of decision transparency is positive but that the nature of the regulatory domain may weaken or strengthen this effect.

AB - Decision transparency is often proposed as a way to maintain or even increase citizen trust, yet this assumption is still untested in the context of regulatory agencies. We test the effect of transparency of a typical decision tradeoff in regulatory enforcement: granting forbearance or imposing a sanction. We employed a representative survey experiment (n = 1,546) in which we test the effect of transparency in general (providing information about a decision or not) and the effect of specific types of transparency (process or rationale transparency). We do this for agencies supervising financial markets, education, and health care. We find that overall decision transparency significantly increases citizen trust in only two of the three agencies. Rationale transparency has a more pronounced positive effect only for the Education Inspectorate. We conclude that the overall effect of decision transparency is positive but that the nature of the regulatory domain may weaken or strengthen this effect.

M3 - Article

JO - Regulation & Governance

JF - Regulation & Governance

SN - 1748-5983

ER -