Can Desert Solve the Problem of Stakes?

A Reply to Olsaretti

Huub Brouwer, Willem van der Deijl

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

Abstract

Serena Olsaretti argues that desert cannot serve as a plausible principle of stakes for luck egalitarianism. In this discussion note, we defend the claim that she is too pessimistic about this by introducing a simple, but plausible, desert-based account of stakes that is immune to her argument.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)399-405
Number of pages7
JournalProceedings of the Aristotelian Society
Volume118
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 5 Dec 2018

Fingerprint

Stakes
Luck Egalitarianism

Cite this

@article{d2d0995c140b4d08b4b9dd85369d48a7,
title = "Can Desert Solve the Problem of Stakes?: A Reply to Olsaretti",
abstract = "Serena Olsaretti argues that desert cannot serve as a plausible principle of stakes for luck egalitarianism. In this discussion note, we defend the claim that she is too pessimistic about this by introducing a simple, but plausible, desert-based account of stakes that is immune to her argument.",
author = "Huub Brouwer and {van der Deijl}, Willem",
year = "2018",
month = "12",
day = "5",
doi = "10.1093/arisoc/aoy014",
language = "English",
volume = "118",
pages = "399--405",
journal = "Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society",
issn = "0066-7374",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "3",

}

Can Desert Solve the Problem of Stakes? A Reply to Olsaretti. / Brouwer, Huub; van der Deijl, Willem.

In: Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Vol. 118, No. 3, 05.12.2018, p. 399-405.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Can Desert Solve the Problem of Stakes?

T2 - A Reply to Olsaretti

AU - Brouwer, Huub

AU - van der Deijl, Willem

PY - 2018/12/5

Y1 - 2018/12/5

N2 - Serena Olsaretti argues that desert cannot serve as a plausible principle of stakes for luck egalitarianism. In this discussion note, we defend the claim that she is too pessimistic about this by introducing a simple, but plausible, desert-based account of stakes that is immune to her argument.

AB - Serena Olsaretti argues that desert cannot serve as a plausible principle of stakes for luck egalitarianism. In this discussion note, we defend the claim that she is too pessimistic about this by introducing a simple, but plausible, desert-based account of stakes that is immune to her argument.

U2 - 10.1093/arisoc/aoy014

DO - 10.1093/arisoc/aoy014

M3 - Article

VL - 118

SP - 399

EP - 405

JO - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society

JF - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society

SN - 0066-7374

IS - 3

ER -