Can Desert Solve the Problem of Stakes?: A Reply to Olsaretti

Huub Brouwer; Willem van der Deijl

doi:10.1093/arisoc/aoy014

Can Desert Solve the Problem of Stakes? A Reply to Olsaretti

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Scientific › peer-review

2 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Serena Olsaretti argues that desert cannot serve as a plausible principle of stakes for luck egalitarianism. In this discussion note, we defend the claim that she is too pessimistic about this by introducing a simple, but plausible, desert-based account of stakes that is immune to her argument.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	399-405
Number of pages	7
Journal	Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society
Volume	118
Issue number	3
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1093/arisoc/aoy014
Publication status	Published - 5 Dec 2018

Access to Document

10.1093/arisoc/aoy014

Can desert solve the problem of stakesFinal published version, 102 KBLicence: Taverne

Cite this

@article{d2d0995c140b4d08b4b9dd85369d48a7,

title = "Can Desert Solve the Problem of Stakes?: A Reply to Olsaretti",

abstract = "Serena Olsaretti argues that desert cannot serve as a plausible principle of stakes for luck egalitarianism. In this discussion note, we defend the claim that she is too pessimistic about this by introducing a simple, but plausible, desert-based account of stakes that is immune to her argument.",

author = "Huub Brouwer and \{van der Deijl\}, Willem",

year = "2018",

month = dec,

day = "5",

doi = "10.1093/arisoc/aoy014",

language = "English",

volume = "118",

pages = "399--405",

journal = "Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society",

issn = "0066-7374",

publisher = "Oxford University Press",

number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Can Desert Solve the Problem of Stakes?

T2 - A Reply to Olsaretti

AU - Brouwer, Huub

AU - van der Deijl, Willem

PY - 2018/12/5

Y1 - 2018/12/5

N2 - Serena Olsaretti argues that desert cannot serve as a plausible principle of stakes for luck egalitarianism. In this discussion note, we defend the claim that she is too pessimistic about this by introducing a simple, but plausible, desert-based account of stakes that is immune to her argument.

AB - Serena Olsaretti argues that desert cannot serve as a plausible principle of stakes for luck egalitarianism. In this discussion note, we defend the claim that she is too pessimistic about this by introducing a simple, but plausible, desert-based account of stakes that is immune to her argument.

U2 - 10.1093/arisoc/aoy014

DO - 10.1093/arisoc/aoy014

M3 - Article

SN - 0066-7374

VL - 118

SP - 399

EP - 405

JO - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society

JF - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society

IS - 3

ER -

Can Desert Solve the Problem of Stakes? A Reply to Olsaretti

Abstract

Access to Document

Fingerprint

Cite this