Abstract
Welfare in economics is generally conceived of in terms of the satisfaction of preferences, but a general, comparable index measure of welfare is generally not taken to be possible. In recent years, in response to the usage of measures of subjective well-being as indices of welfare in economics, a number of economists have started to develop measures of welfare based on preference-satisfaction. In order to evaluate the success of such measures, I formulate criteria of policy-relevance and theoretical success in the context of preference-satisfaction measures of welfare. I present a detailed case study of the methodological choices put forward in a prominent generalized proposal for measuring welfare through preferences recently published in the American Economic Review. I contrast this with an alternative welfare measure which also uses preferences to weight aspects of welfare: the ICECAP-A measure. I assess the methodology of both approaches in detail and argue that the two goals of a preference measure of welfare can only be satisfied at the expense of making a measure prohibitively costly.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 126-142 |
Number of pages | 17 |
Journal | Journal of Economic Methodology |
Volume | 25 |
Issue number | 2 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2018 |
Keywords
- Welfare
- utility
- measurement
- happiness
- well-being
- HAPPINESS
- UTILITY
- ECONOMICS
- HEDONISM