Abstract
Welfare in economics is generally conceived of in terms of the satisfaction of preferences, but a general, comparable index measure of welfare is generally not taken to be possible. In recent years, in response to the usage of measures of subjective well-being as indices of welfare in economics, a number of economists have started to develop measures of welfare based on preference-satisfaction. In order to evaluate the success of such measures, I formulate criteria of policy-relevance and theoretical success in the context of preference-satisfaction measures of welfare. I present a detailed case study of the methodological choices put forward in a prominent generalized proposal for measuring welfare through preferences recently published in the American Economic Review. I contrast this with an alternative welfare measure which also uses preferences to weight aspects of welfare: the ICECAP-A measure. I assess the methodology of both approaches in detail and argue that the two goals of a preference measure of welfare can only be satisfied at the expense of making a measure prohibitively costly.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 126-142 |
| Number of pages | 17 |
| Journal | Journal of Economic Methodology |
| Volume | 25 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2018 |
Keywords
- Welfare
- utility
- measurement
- happiness
- well-being
- HAPPINESS
- UTILITY
- ECONOMICS
- HEDONISM
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Can welfare be measured with a preference-satisfaction index?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver