Capacity choice in (strategic) real options models

A survey

Nick Huberts, Kuno Huisman, Peter Kort, Maria Lavrutich

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

Abstract

The theory of real options determines the optimal time to invest in a project of given size. As a main result, it is found that in a more uncertain environment, it is optimal for a firm to delay its investment. In other words, uncertainty generates a “value of waiting.” Recently, contributions appeared that in addition determine the optimal size of the investment. This paper surveys this literature. As a general result, it is obtained that more uncertainty results in larger investments taking place at a later point in time. So, where from the traditional real options literature one can conclude that uncertainty is bad for growth, this is not so clear anymore when also the size of the investment needs to be determined. The survey consists of two parts. First, we present single firm models, and second, we give an overview of the oligopoly models that have appeared up until now.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)424-439
JournalDynamic Games and Applications
Volume5
Issue number4
Early online date19 Jun 2015
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2015

Fingerprint

Real Options
Uncertainty
Oligopoly
Model

Keywords

  • real options
  • competition
  • capacity investment

Cite this

@article{4e8b88a1f56c4b4f835eee11fe809345,
title = "Capacity choice in (strategic) real options models: A survey",
abstract = "The theory of real options determines the optimal time to invest in a project of given size. As a main result, it is found that in a more uncertain environment, it is optimal for a firm to delay its investment. In other words, uncertainty generates a “value of waiting.” Recently, contributions appeared that in addition determine the optimal size of the investment. This paper surveys this literature. As a general result, it is obtained that more uncertainty results in larger investments taking place at a later point in time. So, where from the traditional real options literature one can conclude that uncertainty is bad for growth, this is not so clear anymore when also the size of the investment needs to be determined. The survey consists of two parts. First, we present single firm models, and second, we give an overview of the oligopoly models that have appeared up until now.",
keywords = "real options, competition, capacity investment",
author = "Nick Huberts and Kuno Huisman and Peter Kort and Maria Lavrutich",
year = "2015",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1007/s13235-015-0162-2",
language = "English",
volume = "5",
pages = "424--439",
journal = "Dynamic Games and Applications",
issn = "2153-0785",
publisher = "Springer Science + Business Media",
number = "4",

}

Capacity choice in (strategic) real options models : A survey. / Huberts, Nick; Huisman, Kuno; Kort, Peter; Lavrutich, Maria.

In: Dynamic Games and Applications, Vol. 5, No. 4, 12.2015, p. 424-439.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Capacity choice in (strategic) real options models

T2 - A survey

AU - Huberts, Nick

AU - Huisman, Kuno

AU - Kort, Peter

AU - Lavrutich, Maria

PY - 2015/12

Y1 - 2015/12

N2 - The theory of real options determines the optimal time to invest in a project of given size. As a main result, it is found that in a more uncertain environment, it is optimal for a firm to delay its investment. In other words, uncertainty generates a “value of waiting.” Recently, contributions appeared that in addition determine the optimal size of the investment. This paper surveys this literature. As a general result, it is obtained that more uncertainty results in larger investments taking place at a later point in time. So, where from the traditional real options literature one can conclude that uncertainty is bad for growth, this is not so clear anymore when also the size of the investment needs to be determined. The survey consists of two parts. First, we present single firm models, and second, we give an overview of the oligopoly models that have appeared up until now.

AB - The theory of real options determines the optimal time to invest in a project of given size. As a main result, it is found that in a more uncertain environment, it is optimal for a firm to delay its investment. In other words, uncertainty generates a “value of waiting.” Recently, contributions appeared that in addition determine the optimal size of the investment. This paper surveys this literature. As a general result, it is obtained that more uncertainty results in larger investments taking place at a later point in time. So, where from the traditional real options literature one can conclude that uncertainty is bad for growth, this is not so clear anymore when also the size of the investment needs to be determined. The survey consists of two parts. First, we present single firm models, and second, we give an overview of the oligopoly models that have appeared up until now.

KW - real options

KW - competition

KW - capacity investment

U2 - 10.1007/s13235-015-0162-2

DO - 10.1007/s13235-015-0162-2

M3 - Article

VL - 5

SP - 424

EP - 439

JO - Dynamic Games and Applications

JF - Dynamic Games and Applications

SN - 2153-0785

IS - 4

ER -