Capacity development evaluation

The challenge of the results agenda and measuring return on investment in the global south

B. Vallejo, U. Wehn

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

322 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This study reviews the evaluation of capacity development, identifying capacity development (CD) modalities and the schools of evaluation currently in place. The research joins the results agenda debate, arguing that in dealing with CD interventions, pre-defined indicators fail to represent the process and the key elements that take CD recipients toward patterns of change. The study highlights the fact that CD deals with projects that, by their nature (consisting of change processes designed to initiate change in people, organizations, and/or their enabling environment), rely more on non-planned changes than on the pre-defined indicators and results to contribute to livelihood improvements and social transformation. The study recognizes the difficulty of evaluating CD under straightforward mechanisms. It concludes that the existing approaches are not adequate to truly capture or measure impact, as CD projects, restricted by previously agreed budgets, resources, and time frames, are usually not designed to evaluate the sustainability of change and its impact over the medium or long term. As resources are scarce, donor agencies and policy-makers need to know the value of CD in order to best prioritize their investments. However, due to the nature of these projects, measuring the return rate between the project cost and its impact remains a difficult task. There is a need for new, multi-path approaches to capturing changes in capacity in order to serve as a basis for decision-making regarding CD investments.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-13
JournalWorld Development
Volume79
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2016

Fingerprint

evaluation
resource
development project
decision making
sustainability
cost
project
measuring
Return on investment
Evaluation
Agenda
indicator
resources
livelihood
budget
recipient
costs
rate
need
policy

Keywords

  • capacity development
  • learning
  • evaluation
  • sustainable development goals
  • value for money
  • results agenda

Cite this

@article{d22bbdd55e29404a9ca885aedd5cde38,
title = "Capacity development evaluation: The challenge of the results agenda and measuring return on investment in the global south",
abstract = "This study reviews the evaluation of capacity development, identifying capacity development (CD) modalities and the schools of evaluation currently in place. The research joins the results agenda debate, arguing that in dealing with CD interventions, pre-defined indicators fail to represent the process and the key elements that take CD recipients toward patterns of change. The study highlights the fact that CD deals with projects that, by their nature (consisting of change processes designed to initiate change in people, organizations, and/or their enabling environment), rely more on non-planned changes than on the pre-defined indicators and results to contribute to livelihood improvements and social transformation. The study recognizes the difficulty of evaluating CD under straightforward mechanisms. It concludes that the existing approaches are not adequate to truly capture or measure impact, as CD projects, restricted by previously agreed budgets, resources, and time frames, are usually not designed to evaluate the sustainability of change and its impact over the medium or long term. As resources are scarce, donor agencies and policy-makers need to know the value of CD in order to best prioritize their investments. However, due to the nature of these projects, measuring the return rate between the project cost and its impact remains a difficult task. There is a need for new, multi-path approaches to capturing changes in capacity in order to serve as a basis for decision-making regarding CD investments.",
keywords = "capacity development, learning, evaluation, sustainable development goals, value for money, results agenda",
author = "B. Vallejo and U. Wehn",
note = "Vallejo, B. and Wehn, U. (2016). Capacity Development Evaluation: The Challenge of the Results Agenda and Measuring Return on Investment in the Global South. World Development, 79, 1-13. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2015.10.044",
year = "2016",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1016/j.worlddev.2015.10.044",
language = "English",
volume = "79",
pages = "1--13",
journal = "World Development",
issn = "0305-750X",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",

}

Capacity development evaluation : The challenge of the results agenda and measuring return on investment in the global south. / Vallejo, B.; Wehn, U.

In: World Development, Vol. 79, 03.2016, p. 1-13.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Capacity development evaluation

T2 - The challenge of the results agenda and measuring return on investment in the global south

AU - Vallejo, B.

AU - Wehn, U.

N1 - Vallejo, B. and Wehn, U. (2016). Capacity Development Evaluation: The Challenge of the Results Agenda and Measuring Return on Investment in the Global South. World Development, 79, 1-13. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2015.10.044

PY - 2016/3

Y1 - 2016/3

N2 - This study reviews the evaluation of capacity development, identifying capacity development (CD) modalities and the schools of evaluation currently in place. The research joins the results agenda debate, arguing that in dealing with CD interventions, pre-defined indicators fail to represent the process and the key elements that take CD recipients toward patterns of change. The study highlights the fact that CD deals with projects that, by their nature (consisting of change processes designed to initiate change in people, organizations, and/or their enabling environment), rely more on non-planned changes than on the pre-defined indicators and results to contribute to livelihood improvements and social transformation. The study recognizes the difficulty of evaluating CD under straightforward mechanisms. It concludes that the existing approaches are not adequate to truly capture or measure impact, as CD projects, restricted by previously agreed budgets, resources, and time frames, are usually not designed to evaluate the sustainability of change and its impact over the medium or long term. As resources are scarce, donor agencies and policy-makers need to know the value of CD in order to best prioritize their investments. However, due to the nature of these projects, measuring the return rate between the project cost and its impact remains a difficult task. There is a need for new, multi-path approaches to capturing changes in capacity in order to serve as a basis for decision-making regarding CD investments.

AB - This study reviews the evaluation of capacity development, identifying capacity development (CD) modalities and the schools of evaluation currently in place. The research joins the results agenda debate, arguing that in dealing with CD interventions, pre-defined indicators fail to represent the process and the key elements that take CD recipients toward patterns of change. The study highlights the fact that CD deals with projects that, by their nature (consisting of change processes designed to initiate change in people, organizations, and/or their enabling environment), rely more on non-planned changes than on the pre-defined indicators and results to contribute to livelihood improvements and social transformation. The study recognizes the difficulty of evaluating CD under straightforward mechanisms. It concludes that the existing approaches are not adequate to truly capture or measure impact, as CD projects, restricted by previously agreed budgets, resources, and time frames, are usually not designed to evaluate the sustainability of change and its impact over the medium or long term. As resources are scarce, donor agencies and policy-makers need to know the value of CD in order to best prioritize their investments. However, due to the nature of these projects, measuring the return rate between the project cost and its impact remains a difficult task. There is a need for new, multi-path approaches to capturing changes in capacity in order to serve as a basis for decision-making regarding CD investments.

KW - capacity development

KW - learning

KW - evaluation

KW - sustainable development goals

KW - value for money

KW - results agenda

U2 - 10.1016/j.worlddev.2015.10.044

DO - 10.1016/j.worlddev.2015.10.044

M3 - Article

VL - 79

SP - 1

EP - 13

JO - World Development

JF - World Development

SN - 0305-750X

ER -