CEO satisfaction and intended strategic changes

The moderating role of performance cues

Jorge Villagrasa, T. Buyl, Alejandro Escriba-Esteve

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

Abstract

How do CEOs react to attainment discrepancies in their organizations' performance? Scholars have generally argued that (only) when performance falls below a certain aspiration level do CEOs intend to change the organization's strategy. However, empirical evidence on this issue is ambiguous and inconclusive. We address this puzzle directly by studying how CEOs' cognitive interpretations of performance (their satisfaction with the firm's performance) affect the magnitude of intended strategic changes, and we explore the moderating effect of the context (performance compared to the industry) on this relationship. Using a sample of medium-sized organizations, we find that CEOs' satisfaction with performance is negatively related to intended strategic changes, as expected, but only in contexts of poor performance compared to the industry. The negative relationship becomes less pronounced when performance compared to the industry reaches a certain threshold and even appears to reverse when the latter is extremely high. Moreover, exploratory post hoc analyses tentatively suggest the existence of two alternative intended change trajectories: contractive as a reaction to dissatisfaction and poor performance, and expansive as a response to satisfaction and high performance. These findings help to contextualize the effects of attainment discrepancies in light of conventional performance feedback theory and alternative theoretical perspectives.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)894-910
JournalLong Range Planning
Volume51
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2018

Fingerprint

industry
performance
trajectory
Chief executive officer
Strategic change
effect
Industry
firm
interpretation
Discrepancy
evidence

Keywords

  • ASPIRATION-PERFORMANCE
  • CEO perceptions
  • COMMON METHOD VARIANCE
  • CONSEQUENCES
  • DETERMINANTS
  • FIRM PERFORMANCE
  • Intended strategic change
  • JOB-SATISFACTION
  • Performance feedback
  • REFERENCE POINTS
  • RISK-TAKING
  • Satisfaction with firm performance
  • TOP MANAGEMENT
  • UPPER ECHELONS

Cite this

Villagrasa, Jorge ; Buyl, T. ; Escriba-Esteve, Alejandro. / CEO satisfaction and intended strategic changes : The moderating role of performance cues. In: Long Range Planning. 2018 ; Vol. 51, No. 6. pp. 894-910.
@article{481583f7149245e29525c79ed5bd306c,
title = "CEO satisfaction and intended strategic changes: The moderating role of performance cues",
abstract = "How do CEOs react to attainment discrepancies in their organizations' performance? Scholars have generally argued that (only) when performance falls below a certain aspiration level do CEOs intend to change the organization's strategy. However, empirical evidence on this issue is ambiguous and inconclusive. We address this puzzle directly by studying how CEOs' cognitive interpretations of performance (their satisfaction with the firm's performance) affect the magnitude of intended strategic changes, and we explore the moderating effect of the context (performance compared to the industry) on this relationship. Using a sample of medium-sized organizations, we find that CEOs' satisfaction with performance is negatively related to intended strategic changes, as expected, but only in contexts of poor performance compared to the industry. The negative relationship becomes less pronounced when performance compared to the industry reaches a certain threshold and even appears to reverse when the latter is extremely high. Moreover, exploratory post hoc analyses tentatively suggest the existence of two alternative intended change trajectories: contractive as a reaction to dissatisfaction and poor performance, and expansive as a response to satisfaction and high performance. These findings help to contextualize the effects of attainment discrepancies in light of conventional performance feedback theory and alternative theoretical perspectives.",
keywords = "ASPIRATION-PERFORMANCE, CEO perceptions, COMMON METHOD VARIANCE, CONSEQUENCES, DETERMINANTS, FIRM PERFORMANCE, Intended strategic change, JOB-SATISFACTION, Performance feedback, REFERENCE POINTS, RISK-TAKING, Satisfaction with firm performance, TOP MANAGEMENT, UPPER ECHELONS",
author = "Jorge Villagrasa and T. Buyl and Alejandro Escriba-Esteve",
year = "2018",
doi = "10.1016/j.lrp.2017.12.002",
language = "English",
volume = "51",
pages = "894--910",
journal = "Long Range Planning",
issn = "0024-6301",
publisher = "ELSEVIER SCI LTD",
number = "6",

}

CEO satisfaction and intended strategic changes : The moderating role of performance cues. / Villagrasa, Jorge; Buyl, T.; Escriba-Esteve, Alejandro.

In: Long Range Planning, Vol. 51, No. 6, 2018, p. 894-910.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - CEO satisfaction and intended strategic changes

T2 - The moderating role of performance cues

AU - Villagrasa, Jorge

AU - Buyl, T.

AU - Escriba-Esteve, Alejandro

PY - 2018

Y1 - 2018

N2 - How do CEOs react to attainment discrepancies in their organizations' performance? Scholars have generally argued that (only) when performance falls below a certain aspiration level do CEOs intend to change the organization's strategy. However, empirical evidence on this issue is ambiguous and inconclusive. We address this puzzle directly by studying how CEOs' cognitive interpretations of performance (their satisfaction with the firm's performance) affect the magnitude of intended strategic changes, and we explore the moderating effect of the context (performance compared to the industry) on this relationship. Using a sample of medium-sized organizations, we find that CEOs' satisfaction with performance is negatively related to intended strategic changes, as expected, but only in contexts of poor performance compared to the industry. The negative relationship becomes less pronounced when performance compared to the industry reaches a certain threshold and even appears to reverse when the latter is extremely high. Moreover, exploratory post hoc analyses tentatively suggest the existence of two alternative intended change trajectories: contractive as a reaction to dissatisfaction and poor performance, and expansive as a response to satisfaction and high performance. These findings help to contextualize the effects of attainment discrepancies in light of conventional performance feedback theory and alternative theoretical perspectives.

AB - How do CEOs react to attainment discrepancies in their organizations' performance? Scholars have generally argued that (only) when performance falls below a certain aspiration level do CEOs intend to change the organization's strategy. However, empirical evidence on this issue is ambiguous and inconclusive. We address this puzzle directly by studying how CEOs' cognitive interpretations of performance (their satisfaction with the firm's performance) affect the magnitude of intended strategic changes, and we explore the moderating effect of the context (performance compared to the industry) on this relationship. Using a sample of medium-sized organizations, we find that CEOs' satisfaction with performance is negatively related to intended strategic changes, as expected, but only in contexts of poor performance compared to the industry. The negative relationship becomes less pronounced when performance compared to the industry reaches a certain threshold and even appears to reverse when the latter is extremely high. Moreover, exploratory post hoc analyses tentatively suggest the existence of two alternative intended change trajectories: contractive as a reaction to dissatisfaction and poor performance, and expansive as a response to satisfaction and high performance. These findings help to contextualize the effects of attainment discrepancies in light of conventional performance feedback theory and alternative theoretical perspectives.

KW - ASPIRATION-PERFORMANCE

KW - CEO perceptions

KW - COMMON METHOD VARIANCE

KW - CONSEQUENCES

KW - DETERMINANTS

KW - FIRM PERFORMANCE

KW - Intended strategic change

KW - JOB-SATISFACTION

KW - Performance feedback

KW - REFERENCE POINTS

KW - RISK-TAKING

KW - Satisfaction with firm performance

KW - TOP MANAGEMENT

KW - UPPER ECHELONS

U2 - 10.1016/j.lrp.2017.12.002

DO - 10.1016/j.lrp.2017.12.002

M3 - Article

VL - 51

SP - 894

EP - 910

JO - Long Range Planning

JF - Long Range Planning

SN - 0024-6301

IS - 6

ER -