CFE ECJ Task Force: Opinion Statement ECJ-TF 2/2021 on the CJEU decision of 25 February 2021 in Case C-403/19, Société Générale, on the calculation of the maximum amount of a foreign direct tax credit

Eric Kemmeren, Alfredo García Prats, Werner Haslehner, Volker Heydt, Institute for Austrian and International Tax Law of Wien, Michael Lang, João Nogueira, Christiana HJI Panayi, Emmanuel de la Blétière, Stella Raventos-Calvo, Isabelle Richelle, Alexander Rust, Rupert Shiers

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleProfessional

Abstract

The Court’s judgment in Société Générale reinforces established case law that EU law neither prohibits juridical double taxation nor does it put an obligation on the residence Member State to prevent the disadvantages which could arise from the exercise of competence thus attributed by the two Member States. The parallel existence of taxing jurisdiction, however, must be distinguished from the exercise of such jurisdiction by each Member State. While Member States are free to determine the connecting factors for the allocation of taxing jurisdiction in tax treaties, “the exercise of the power of taxation, so allocated by bilateral conventions for the avoidance of double taxation, the Member States must comply with EU rules and, more particularly, observe the principle of equal treatment”.

It is generally accepted in the Court’s case law that both the ordinary credit and exemption (including exemption with progression) are permissible methods to avoid double taxation. In Société Générale this position was confirmed, specifically as regards the “maximum deduction” under the ordinary credit method in tax treaties, even though this treatment can result in a disadvantage for cross-border income as compared with domestic income. As the disadvantage in Société Générale was due to the difference between gross-basis taxation of dividends in the source Member States (Italy, the Netherlands and the UK) and net-basis taxation of those foreign-sourced dividends in the residence State (France), it remains to be seen if future cases will bring clarity in light of the Seabrokers judgment of the EFTA Court which examined how expenses can be lawfully allocated to foreign income from the perspective of the residence Member State.

The CFE Tax Advisers Europe stresses that in an Internal Market neither (unintended) double non-taxation nor double taxation is acceptable. It, therefore, calls on all EU institutions to analyze and address the remaining issues of juridical double taxation – including in the context of the upcoming actions amending current corporate tax directives.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)30-39
JournalEuropean Taxation
Volume62
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - 2022

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'CFE ECJ Task Force: Opinion Statement ECJ-TF 2/2021 on the CJEU decision of 25 February 2021 in Case C-403/19, Société Générale, on the calculation of the maximum amount of a foreign direct tax credit'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this