CFE ECJ Task Force: Opinion Statement ECJ-TF 3/2021 on the CJEU decision of 18 March 2021 in Case C-388/19, MK v Autoridade Tributária e Aduaneira, on the taxpayers’ option to avoid discriminatory taxation of capital gains

Eric Kemmeren, Alfredo García Prats, Werner Haslehner, European Commission, Georg Kofler, Michael Lang, IBFD Nogueira, Christiana HJI Panayi, Emmanuel Raingeard de la Blétière, Stella Raventos-Calvo, Isabelle Richelle, Alexander Rust , Rupert Shiers

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleProfessional

Abstract

This is an Opinion Statement prepared by the CFE ECJ Task Force1 on the MK v Autoridade Tributária e Aduaneira case, in which the First Chamber of the Court of Justice of the EU (ECJ) delivered its decision on 18 March 2021,2 which deviated from the Opinion delivered by Advocate General Hogan, on the 19 November 2021.3 In MK, the Court confirmed its previous case law and held that the Portuguese (optional) regime for taxation of capital gains from immovable property of non-residents was contrary to the free movement of capital under Article 63 TFEU since non-residents were taxed less favourably than residents. The fact that the domestic system provided an election for non-residents to be treated as residents was not sufficient to consider the rule as compatible with EU Law.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)121-126
JournalEuropean Taxation
Volume66
Issue number2
Publication statusPublished - 2022

Keywords

  • EU law
  • Free movement of capital
  • Taxation of capital gains
  • Immovable property
  • Restriction

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'CFE ECJ Task Force: Opinion Statement ECJ-TF 3/2021 on the CJEU decision of 18 March 2021 in Case C-388/19, MK v Autoridade Tributária e Aduaneira, on the taxpayers’ option to avoid discriminatory taxation of capital gains'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this