Charitable giving, emotions, and the default effect

Lenka Fiala, Charles Noussair

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

Abstract

We report an experiment to study the effect of defaults on charitable giving. In three different treatments, participants face varying default levels of donation. In three other treatments that are paired with the first three, they receive the same defaults, but are informed that defaults are thought to have an effect on their donation decisions. The emotional state of all individuals is monitored throughout the sessions using Facereading software, and some participants are required to report their emotional state after the donation decision. We find that the level at which a default is set has no effect on donations, and informing individuals of the possible impact of defaults also has no effect. Individuals who are happier and in a more positive overall emotional state donate more. Donors experience a negative change in the valence of their emotional state subsequent to donating, when valence is measured with Facereading software. This contrasts with the self-report data, in which donating correlates with a more positive reported subsequent emotional state
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1792-1812
JournalEconomic Inquiry
Volume55
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2017

Fingerprint

Emotion
Charitable giving
Donation
Valence
Software
Experiment
Correlates
Self-report

Cite this

Fiala, Lenka ; Noussair, Charles. / Charitable giving, emotions, and the default effect. In: Economic Inquiry. 2017 ; Vol. 55, No. 4. pp. 1792-1812.
@article{dd50e1d3a27c4bd3be2d3108558ebc30,
title = "Charitable giving, emotions, and the default effect",
abstract = "We report an experiment to study the effect of defaults on charitable giving. In three different treatments, participants face varying default levels of donation. In three other treatments that are paired with the first three, they receive the same defaults, but are informed that defaults are thought to have an effect on their donation decisions. The emotional state of all individuals is monitored throughout the sessions using Facereading software, and some participants are required to report their emotional state after the donation decision. We find that the level at which a default is set has no effect on donations, and informing individuals of the possible impact of defaults also has no effect. Individuals who are happier and in a more positive overall emotional state donate more. Donors experience a negative change in the valence of their emotional state subsequent to donating, when valence is measured with Facereading software. This contrasts with the self-report data, in which donating correlates with a more positive reported subsequent emotional state",
author = "Lenka Fiala and Charles Noussair",
year = "2017",
month = "10",
doi = "10.1111/ecin.12459",
language = "English",
volume = "55",
pages = "1792--1812",
journal = "Economic Inquiry",
issn = "0095-2583",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "4",

}

Charitable giving, emotions, and the default effect. / Fiala, Lenka; Noussair, Charles.

In: Economic Inquiry, Vol. 55, No. 4, 10.2017, p. 1792-1812.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Charitable giving, emotions, and the default effect

AU - Fiala, Lenka

AU - Noussair, Charles

PY - 2017/10

Y1 - 2017/10

N2 - We report an experiment to study the effect of defaults on charitable giving. In three different treatments, participants face varying default levels of donation. In three other treatments that are paired with the first three, they receive the same defaults, but are informed that defaults are thought to have an effect on their donation decisions. The emotional state of all individuals is monitored throughout the sessions using Facereading software, and some participants are required to report their emotional state after the donation decision. We find that the level at which a default is set has no effect on donations, and informing individuals of the possible impact of defaults also has no effect. Individuals who are happier and in a more positive overall emotional state donate more. Donors experience a negative change in the valence of their emotional state subsequent to donating, when valence is measured with Facereading software. This contrasts with the self-report data, in which donating correlates with a more positive reported subsequent emotional state

AB - We report an experiment to study the effect of defaults on charitable giving. In three different treatments, participants face varying default levels of donation. In three other treatments that are paired with the first three, they receive the same defaults, but are informed that defaults are thought to have an effect on their donation decisions. The emotional state of all individuals is monitored throughout the sessions using Facereading software, and some participants are required to report their emotional state after the donation decision. We find that the level at which a default is set has no effect on donations, and informing individuals of the possible impact of defaults also has no effect. Individuals who are happier and in a more positive overall emotional state donate more. Donors experience a negative change in the valence of their emotional state subsequent to donating, when valence is measured with Facereading software. This contrasts with the self-report data, in which donating correlates with a more positive reported subsequent emotional state

U2 - 10.1111/ecin.12459

DO - 10.1111/ecin.12459

M3 - Article

VL - 55

SP - 1792

EP - 1812

JO - Economic Inquiry

JF - Economic Inquiry

SN - 0095-2583

IS - 4

ER -