TY - JOUR
T1 - Chasing a pot of gold
T2 - An analysis of emerging recovery-oriented addiction policies in Flanders (Belgium) and The Netherlands
AU - Bellaert, Lore
AU - Martinelli, Thomas F.
AU - Vanderplasschen, Wouter
AU - Best, David
AU - van de Mheen, Dike
AU - Vander Laenen, Freya
N1 - Funding Information:
REC-PATH is a collaborative project supported by the European Research Area Network on Illicit Drugs (ERANID). This work was funded in the United Kingdom by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Policy Research Program and the Scottish Government, in Belgium (Flanders) by the Belgian Federal Science Policy Office (BELSPO) and the Research Foundation-Flanders (FWO), and in the Netherlands by the Netherlands Organization for Health Research & Development (ZonMw).
PY - 2021
Y1 - 2021
N2 - Following the paradigm shift to recovery in the Anglophone world, recovery is also gaining momentum in drug policy and practice in Flanders (Belgium) and the Netherlands. Since the meaning of recovery is being debated internationally, broadening the assessment of how the recovery framework is applied in policy discourse and how it is implemented in various international contexts is imperative. This comparative policy analysis aims to assess similarities and differences in addiction recovery vision, implementation, and evaluation in Flanders and the Netherlands. The thematic analysis draws upon a triangulation of different data collection methods: a focus group (n = 14) and interviews (n = 21) with key figures in the addictions field, followed by analyses of relevant policy documents (n = 9). Our findings show that a holistic vision of addiction recovery is endorsed in both countries. Although differences in policy development occurred (i.e. centrally driven in Flanders versus ‘bottom-up’ in the Netherlands), similar challenges emerged concerning recovery-oriented addiction policies. While policymakers in Flanders and the addiction sector in the Netherlands strongly proclaim recovery, structural implementation, dedicated funding, and systematic evaluation of recovery-oriented policies are lacking. This study suggests that systematic inclusion of experts by experience and aligning government and practice level funding and policies are crucial.
AB - Following the paradigm shift to recovery in the Anglophone world, recovery is also gaining momentum in drug policy and practice in Flanders (Belgium) and the Netherlands. Since the meaning of recovery is being debated internationally, broadening the assessment of how the recovery framework is applied in policy discourse and how it is implemented in various international contexts is imperative. This comparative policy analysis aims to assess similarities and differences in addiction recovery vision, implementation, and evaluation in Flanders and the Netherlands. The thematic analysis draws upon a triangulation of different data collection methods: a focus group (n = 14) and interviews (n = 21) with key figures in the addictions field, followed by analyses of relevant policy documents (n = 9). Our findings show that a holistic vision of addiction recovery is endorsed in both countries. Although differences in policy development occurred (i.e. centrally driven in Flanders versus ‘bottom-up’ in the Netherlands), similar challenges emerged concerning recovery-oriented addiction policies. While policymakers in Flanders and the addiction sector in the Netherlands strongly proclaim recovery, structural implementation, dedicated funding, and systematic evaluation of recovery-oriented policies are lacking. This study suggests that systematic inclusion of experts by experience and aligning government and practice level funding and policies are crucial.
KW - ADDICTION
KW - Drug Policy
KW - RECOVERY
KW - international comparison
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85105198975&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/09687637.2021.1915250
DO - 10.1080/09687637.2021.1915250
M3 - Article
SN - 0968-7637
VL - 28
SP - 399
EP - 410
JO - Drugs-Education, Prevention and Policy
JF - Drugs-Education, Prevention and Policy
IS - 5
ER -