Children's planning performance in the Zoo Map task (BADS-C): Is it driven by general cognitive ability, executive functioning, or prospection?

Nicola Ballhausen*, Caitlin E. V. Mahy, Alexandra Hering, Babett Voigt, Katharina M. Schnitzspahn, Prune Lagner, Andreas Ihle, Matthias Kliegel

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

Abstract

A minimal amount of research has examined the cognitive predictors of children's performance in naturalistic, errand-type planning tasks such as the Zoo Map task of the Behavioral Assessment of the Dysexecutive Syndrome for Children (BADS-C). Thus, the current study examined prospection (i.e., the ability to remember to carry out a future intention), executive functioning, and intelligence markers as predictors of performance in this widely used naturalistic planning task in 56 children aged 7- to 12-years-old. Measures of planning, prospection, inhibition, crystallized intelligence, and fluid intelligence were collected in an individual differences study. Regression analyses showed that prospection (rather than traditional measures of intelligence or inhibition) predicted planning, suggesting that naturalistic planning tasks such as the Zoo Map task may rely on future-oriented cognitive processes rather than executive problem solving or general knowledge.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)138-144
Number of pages7
JournalApplied Neuropsychology: Child
Volume6
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2017
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Children
  • planning
  • prospection
  • zoo map task
  • DEFICIT HYPERACTIVITY DISORDER
  • PROSPECTIVE MEMORY
  • YOUNG-CHILDREN
  • BEHAVIORAL-ASSESSMENT
  • DYSEXECUTIVE SYNDROME
  • FUTURE THINKING
  • PRESCHOOL YEARS
  • AGE
  • EMERGENCE
  • VALIDITY

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Children's planning performance in the Zoo Map task (BADS-C): Is it driven by general cognitive ability, executive functioning, or prospection?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this