Choosing an adequate design and analysis in cross-cultural personality research

Jia He, Fons van de Vijver

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

33 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The flourishing of cross-cultural personality research requires a keen eye for rigorous methodology in such research. With decades of experience in cross-cultural research methods, we have come to appreciate that methodological aspects of such studies are critical for obtaining valid findings. Ill-designed or -conducted studies may produce results that are difficult to interpret. A careful design and analysis can help to deal with various methodological problems in cross-cultural personality studies. Drawing on the extensive knowledge that has been accumulated in cross-cultural and personality research in the past decades, we describe a framework of bias and equivalence that enables the choice of adequate research methods and the avoidance of pitfalls that endanger valid conclusions in cross-cultural personality research. Specifically, we focus on sampling issues, test adaptations, and the combination of emic and etic approaches in this short review article. We encourage researchers to use the tools and experience that are available to considerably enlarge our insights in cross-cultural differences and similarities in personality research.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)3-10
JournalCurrent Issues in Personality Psychology
Volume5
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 15 Feb 2017

Cite this

@article{bbe760d66b2a416c8fc962773e810371,
title = "Choosing an adequate design and analysis in cross-cultural personality research",
abstract = "The flourishing of cross-cultural personality research requires a keen eye for rigorous methodology in such research. With decades of experience in cross-cultural research methods, we have come to appreciate that methodological aspects of such studies are critical for obtaining valid findings. Ill-designed or -conducted studies may produce results that are difficult to interpret. A careful design and analysis can help to deal with various methodological problems in cross-cultural personality studies. Drawing on the extensive knowledge that has been accumulated in cross-cultural and personality research in the past decades, we describe a framework of bias and equivalence that enables the choice of adequate research methods and the avoidance of pitfalls that endanger valid conclusions in cross-cultural personality research. Specifically, we focus on sampling issues, test adaptations, and the combination of emic and etic approaches in this short review article. We encourage researchers to use the tools and experience that are available to considerably enlarge our insights in cross-cultural differences and similarities in personality research.",
author = "Jia He and {van de Vijver}, Fons",
year = "2017",
month = "2",
day = "15",
doi = "10.5114/cipp.2017.65824",
language = "English",
volume = "5",
pages = "3--10",
journal = "Current Issues in Personality Psychology",
issn = "2353-4192",
publisher = "Termedia Publishing House Ltd.",
number = "1",

}

Choosing an adequate design and analysis in cross-cultural personality research. / He, Jia; van de Vijver, Fons.

In: Current Issues in Personality Psychology, Vol. 5, No. 1, 15.02.2017, p. 3-10.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Choosing an adequate design and analysis in cross-cultural personality research

AU - He, Jia

AU - van de Vijver, Fons

PY - 2017/2/15

Y1 - 2017/2/15

N2 - The flourishing of cross-cultural personality research requires a keen eye for rigorous methodology in such research. With decades of experience in cross-cultural research methods, we have come to appreciate that methodological aspects of such studies are critical for obtaining valid findings. Ill-designed or -conducted studies may produce results that are difficult to interpret. A careful design and analysis can help to deal with various methodological problems in cross-cultural personality studies. Drawing on the extensive knowledge that has been accumulated in cross-cultural and personality research in the past decades, we describe a framework of bias and equivalence that enables the choice of adequate research methods and the avoidance of pitfalls that endanger valid conclusions in cross-cultural personality research. Specifically, we focus on sampling issues, test adaptations, and the combination of emic and etic approaches in this short review article. We encourage researchers to use the tools and experience that are available to considerably enlarge our insights in cross-cultural differences and similarities in personality research.

AB - The flourishing of cross-cultural personality research requires a keen eye for rigorous methodology in such research. With decades of experience in cross-cultural research methods, we have come to appreciate that methodological aspects of such studies are critical for obtaining valid findings. Ill-designed or -conducted studies may produce results that are difficult to interpret. A careful design and analysis can help to deal with various methodological problems in cross-cultural personality studies. Drawing on the extensive knowledge that has been accumulated in cross-cultural and personality research in the past decades, we describe a framework of bias and equivalence that enables the choice of adequate research methods and the avoidance of pitfalls that endanger valid conclusions in cross-cultural personality research. Specifically, we focus on sampling issues, test adaptations, and the combination of emic and etic approaches in this short review article. We encourage researchers to use the tools and experience that are available to considerably enlarge our insights in cross-cultural differences and similarities in personality research.

U2 - 10.5114/cipp.2017.65824

DO - 10.5114/cipp.2017.65824

M3 - Article

VL - 5

SP - 3

EP - 10

JO - Current Issues in Personality Psychology

JF - Current Issues in Personality Psychology

SN - 2353-4192

IS - 1

ER -