Choosing referring expressions in Belgian and Netherlandic Dutch: Effects of animacy

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

244 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

It has been argued that animate entities are referred to with more attenuated expressions than inanimate entities, because they are more accessible in memory. Two previously untested claims made for Dutch suggest that the situation may be more complex. Firstly, it has been stated that full pronouns can only refer to animate entities, while reduced pronouns can also refer to inanimate entities. This seems to be inconsistent with the accessibility account. Secondly, inanimate entities may be pronominalized less to avoid gender-marked expressions when grammatical gender is unclear. Using a sentence completion task, we tested these claims by investigating the effect of animacy on both the choice of pronouns versus more specific expressions and the choice of reduced versus full pronouns in Dutch. We compared speakers of Netherlandic Dutch, who have generally lost intuitions about masculine and feminine grammatical gender of nouns, with speakers of Belgian Dutch, for whom these intuitions are still relatively intact. Both groups showed an effect of animacy on pronominalization, suggesting that this effect cannot only be explained as a gender avoidance strategy. At the same time, the choice between full and reduced pronouns cannot be explained by accessibility. Implications for theories of reference production are discussed. © 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)104-121
Number of pages18
JournalLingua. International review of general linguistics
Volume145
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2014

Fingerprint

Belgian
gender
intuition
Pronoun
Entity
Referring Expressions
Animacy
Group
Grammatical Gender
Accessibility
Intuition

Keywords

  • Animacy
  • Accessibility
  • Pronouns
  • Grammatical gender
  • Dutch

Cite this

@article{c3d72515cd7e4014bb8da9c20ec6244e,
title = "Choosing referring expressions in Belgian and Netherlandic Dutch: Effects of animacy",
abstract = "It has been argued that animate entities are referred to with more attenuated expressions than inanimate entities, because they are more accessible in memory. Two previously untested claims made for Dutch suggest that the situation may be more complex. Firstly, it has been stated that full pronouns can only refer to animate entities, while reduced pronouns can also refer to inanimate entities. This seems to be inconsistent with the accessibility account. Secondly, inanimate entities may be pronominalized less to avoid gender-marked expressions when grammatical gender is unclear. Using a sentence completion task, we tested these claims by investigating the effect of animacy on both the choice of pronouns versus more specific expressions and the choice of reduced versus full pronouns in Dutch. We compared speakers of Netherlandic Dutch, who have generally lost intuitions about masculine and feminine grammatical gender of nouns, with speakers of Belgian Dutch, for whom these intuitions are still relatively intact. Both groups showed an effect of animacy on pronominalization, suggesting that this effect cannot only be explained as a gender avoidance strategy. At the same time, the choice between full and reduced pronouns cannot be explained by accessibility. Implications for theories of reference production are discussed. {\circledC} 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.",
keywords = "Animacy, Accessibility, Pronouns, Grammatical gender, Dutch",
author = "J. Vogels and A.A. Maes and E.J. Krahmer",
year = "2014",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1016/j.lingua.2014.03.007",
language = "English",
volume = "145",
pages = "104--121",
journal = "Lingua. International review of general linguistics",
issn = "0024-3841",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

Choosing referring expressions in Belgian and Netherlandic Dutch : Effects of animacy. / Vogels, J.; Maes, A.A.; Krahmer, E.J.

In: Lingua. International review of general linguistics, Vol. 145, 06.2014, p. 104-121.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Choosing referring expressions in Belgian and Netherlandic Dutch

T2 - Effects of animacy

AU - Vogels, J.

AU - Maes, A.A.

AU - Krahmer, E.J.

PY - 2014/6

Y1 - 2014/6

N2 - It has been argued that animate entities are referred to with more attenuated expressions than inanimate entities, because they are more accessible in memory. Two previously untested claims made for Dutch suggest that the situation may be more complex. Firstly, it has been stated that full pronouns can only refer to animate entities, while reduced pronouns can also refer to inanimate entities. This seems to be inconsistent with the accessibility account. Secondly, inanimate entities may be pronominalized less to avoid gender-marked expressions when grammatical gender is unclear. Using a sentence completion task, we tested these claims by investigating the effect of animacy on both the choice of pronouns versus more specific expressions and the choice of reduced versus full pronouns in Dutch. We compared speakers of Netherlandic Dutch, who have generally lost intuitions about masculine and feminine grammatical gender of nouns, with speakers of Belgian Dutch, for whom these intuitions are still relatively intact. Both groups showed an effect of animacy on pronominalization, suggesting that this effect cannot only be explained as a gender avoidance strategy. At the same time, the choice between full and reduced pronouns cannot be explained by accessibility. Implications for theories of reference production are discussed. © 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

AB - It has been argued that animate entities are referred to with more attenuated expressions than inanimate entities, because they are more accessible in memory. Two previously untested claims made for Dutch suggest that the situation may be more complex. Firstly, it has been stated that full pronouns can only refer to animate entities, while reduced pronouns can also refer to inanimate entities. This seems to be inconsistent with the accessibility account. Secondly, inanimate entities may be pronominalized less to avoid gender-marked expressions when grammatical gender is unclear. Using a sentence completion task, we tested these claims by investigating the effect of animacy on both the choice of pronouns versus more specific expressions and the choice of reduced versus full pronouns in Dutch. We compared speakers of Netherlandic Dutch, who have generally lost intuitions about masculine and feminine grammatical gender of nouns, with speakers of Belgian Dutch, for whom these intuitions are still relatively intact. Both groups showed an effect of animacy on pronominalization, suggesting that this effect cannot only be explained as a gender avoidance strategy. At the same time, the choice between full and reduced pronouns cannot be explained by accessibility. Implications for theories of reference production are discussed. © 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

KW - Animacy

KW - Accessibility

KW - Pronouns

KW - Grammatical gender

KW - Dutch

U2 - 10.1016/j.lingua.2014.03.007

DO - 10.1016/j.lingua.2014.03.007

M3 - Article

VL - 145

SP - 104

EP - 121

JO - Lingua. International review of general linguistics

JF - Lingua. International review of general linguistics

SN - 0024-3841

ER -