TY - JOUR
T1 - Cisheterosexual people in post-closeted times
T2 - The role of evading difference in managing an advantaged identity and legitimizing of inequalities
AU - Quezada, Enzo Caceres
AU - Doosje, Bertjan
AU - Sabates, Paula Fernandez
AU - Boiger, Michael
AU - Kende, Judit
N1 - Supplemental data for this article can be accessed online at https://doi.org/10.1080/00918369.2025.2485145
PY - 2025/4/28
Y1 - 2025/4/28
N2 - How do cisheterosexual people navigate inequality against LGBTQ people in contexts where discrimination is often considered a matter of the past? We argue that some do so by evading difference based on sexual orientation and gender identity. While emphasizing individuals and their fundamental sameness may convey an egalitarian standpoint, evading difference might obscure markers of intergroup inequality, blur the advantaged status of cisheterosexual people, and thereby legitimize structural inequality. Using mixed-methods-in-depth interviews (N = 20) and online surveys (N = 531)-we characterized distinct profiles of cisheterosexual people in the Netherlands, combining low-to-high difference evasion ("People who focus a lot on sexual orientation and gender identity forget that we are all just people") with low-to-high inequality evasion ("Compared to cisgender and heterosexual people, LGBTQ people have equal opportunities"). In turn, these profiles distinguished how cisheterosexual people manage their advantaged identity and their ideological outlook on inequality. Specifically, those evading difference were more likely to evade inequality than those acknowledging difference. Furthermore, those acknowledging difference were most likely to recognize privilege and exhibit a substantive egalitarian outlook. We conclude by discussing how cisheterosexual people can either perpetuate or challenge inequality by managing difference and the implications of these findings.
AB - How do cisheterosexual people navigate inequality against LGBTQ people in contexts where discrimination is often considered a matter of the past? We argue that some do so by evading difference based on sexual orientation and gender identity. While emphasizing individuals and their fundamental sameness may convey an egalitarian standpoint, evading difference might obscure markers of intergroup inequality, blur the advantaged status of cisheterosexual people, and thereby legitimize structural inequality. Using mixed-methods-in-depth interviews (N = 20) and online surveys (N = 531)-we characterized distinct profiles of cisheterosexual people in the Netherlands, combining low-to-high difference evasion ("People who focus a lot on sexual orientation and gender identity forget that we are all just people") with low-to-high inequality evasion ("Compared to cisgender and heterosexual people, LGBTQ people have equal opportunities"). In turn, these profiles distinguished how cisheterosexual people manage their advantaged identity and their ideological outlook on inequality. Specifically, those evading difference were more likely to evade inequality than those acknowledging difference. Furthermore, those acknowledging difference were most likely to recognize privilege and exhibit a substantive egalitarian outlook. We conclude by discussing how cisheterosexual people can either perpetuate or challenge inequality by managing difference and the implications of these findings.
KW - Difference evasion
KW - SOGI inequality
KW - Advantaged identity strategies
KW - Cisheterosexuality
KW - Diversity ideologies
KW - Identity-blind
KW - Structural thinking
UR - https://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=wosstart_imp_pure20230417&SrcAuth=WosAPI&KeyUT=WOS:001478075700001&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=WOS_CPL
U2 - 10.1080/00918369.2025.2485145
DO - 10.1080/00918369.2025.2485145
M3 - Article
C2 - 40293871
SN - 0091-8369
JO - Journal of Homosexuality
JF - Journal of Homosexuality
ER -