TY - JOUR
T1 - Citizen perceptions of ideological bias in public service institutions
T2 - A cross-institutional analysis in five countries
AU - van Elsas, Erika J.
AU - Sipma, Take
AU - Meijers, Maurits J.
N1 - Supplementary material. For supplementary material accompanying this paper visit https://doi.org/10.1017/
S1475676525100194
Data availability statement. The LISS data (Netherlands) is publicly available from the LISS data archive. The datasets used
for this study are ‘Public perceptions of bias in impartial institutions’ (https://doi.org/10.17026/dans-xt3-h48j) and ‘Politics
and Values Wave 14’ (https://doi.org/10.17026/dans-xnn-gs7b), which can be accessed after registration. The Yougov data
(Germany, the United Kingdom, Spain, and Poland) as well as the code used for data preparation and analysis are available at
OSF, https://osf.io/vyjcz/.
PY - 2025/9/30
Y1 - 2025/9/30
N2 - Public service institutions such as the judiciary, universities, and the police force derive their legitimacy from their impartial functioning. Yet, around the world, such institutions are increasingly accused of holding a left- or right-wing bias. This study examines to what extent citizens perceive ideological bias among the actors working in public service institutions, and what explains these perceptions. We collected original survey data in five European countries (Germany, the United Kingdom, Spain, Poland, and the Netherlands), measuring citizen perceptions of left-right bias among the actors working in six public service institutions. We find that bias perceptions are widespread, with some institutional actors (scientists, schoolteachers, and journalists) being associated more to the left, and others (police, judges) more to the right. Bias perceptions are more common among citizens with more political interest, lower levels of education and income, and ideologically extreme positions. Crucially, we find that the (left-right) direction of perceived bias depends on one’s own (left-right) position, such that left- and right-leaning citizens tend to associate institutional actors with the opposite (‘hostile’) ideology. Our analyses reveal cross-national and cross-institutional variation in bias perceptions and suggest that public service institutions can become politicised in the eyes of citizens. This highlights the need for further research into the contextual drivers of bias perceptions and their implications for perceived institutional legitimacy.
AB - Public service institutions such as the judiciary, universities, and the police force derive their legitimacy from their impartial functioning. Yet, around the world, such institutions are increasingly accused of holding a left- or right-wing bias. This study examines to what extent citizens perceive ideological bias among the actors working in public service institutions, and what explains these perceptions. We collected original survey data in five European countries (Germany, the United Kingdom, Spain, Poland, and the Netherlands), measuring citizen perceptions of left-right bias among the actors working in six public service institutions. We find that bias perceptions are widespread, with some institutional actors (scientists, schoolteachers, and journalists) being associated more to the left, and others (police, judges) more to the right. Bias perceptions are more common among citizens with more political interest, lower levels of education and income, and ideologically extreme positions. Crucially, we find that the (left-right) direction of perceived bias depends on one’s own (left-right) position, such that left- and right-leaning citizens tend to associate institutional actors with the opposite (‘hostile’) ideology. Our analyses reveal cross-national and cross-institutional variation in bias perceptions and suggest that public service institutions can become politicised in the eyes of citizens. This highlights the need for further research into the contextual drivers of bias perceptions and their implications for perceived institutional legitimacy.
U2 - 10.1017/S1475676525100194
DO - 10.1017/S1475676525100194
M3 - Article
SN - 0304-4130
SP - 1
EP - 23
JO - European Journal of Political Research
JF - European Journal of Political Research
ER -