Abstract
By means of a reanalysis of the most relevant data source-the International Social Mobility and Politics File-this article criticizes the newly grown consensus in political sociology that class voting has declined since World War II. An increase in crosscutting cultural voting, rooted in educational differences rather than a decline in class voting, proves responsible,for the decline of traditional class-party alignments. Moreover, income differences have not become less but more consequential for voting behavior during this period. It is concluded that the new consensus has been built on quicksand. Class is not dead-it has been buried alive under the increasing weight of cultural voting, systematically misinterpreted as a decline in class voting because of the widespread application of the so-called Alford index.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 403-426 |
| Number of pages | 24 |
| Journal | Politics & society |
| Volume | 35 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Sept 2007 |
| Externally published | Yes |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 10 Reduced Inequalities
Keywords
- death of class debate
- old versus new politics
- political change
- class analysis
- realignment versus dealignment
- WORKING-CLASS AUTHORITARIANISM
- POLITICS
- VALUES
- PARTICIPATION
- DEMOCRACIES
- TOLERANCE
- EDUCATION
- BEHAVIOR
- ELITES
- US
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Class is not dead - It has been buried alive: Class voting and cultural voting in postwar western societies (1956-1990)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver