Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Closed-loop neurotechnologies, agency and mental interference

  • Vera Tesink*
  • , Thomas Douglas
  • , Lisa Forsberg
  • , Sjors Ligthart
  • , Gerben Meynen
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Scientific › peer-review

17 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Closed-loop neurotechnologies bring great promise for treating neurological and psychiatricdisorders. However, the use of artificial intelligence (ai) in their application raises ethicalconcerns, since ai-driven closed-loop devices may cause unforeseen mental interference thatmight, absent consent, infringe the user’s mental rights. Whether such worries are warranted,however, may depend on whether closed-loop neurotechnologies qualify as moral agents,and on whether they are distinct from the moral agent on whose brain they act. if they arenot moral agents, or are not separate moral agents, they will arguably be incapable ofinfringing the user’s mental rights. in this article, we explore different possible agentialrelationships between the human user and closed-loop neurotechnologies and consider theimplications for the protection that our mental rights provide.
Original languageEnglish
Number of pages13
JournalAJOB Neuroscience
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 11 Jun 2026

Keywords

  • closed-loop neurotechnology
  • agency
  • artificial intelligence
  • mental interference
  • moral rights

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Closed-loop neurotechnologies, agency and mental interference'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this