Abstract
Closed-loop neurotechnologies bring great promise for treating neurological and psychiatricdisorders. However, the use of artificial intelligence (ai) in their application raises ethicalconcerns, since ai-driven closed-loop devices may cause unforeseen mental interference thatmight, absent consent, infringe the user’s mental rights. Whether such worries are warranted,however, may depend on whether closed-loop neurotechnologies qualify as moral agents,and on whether they are distinct from the moral agent on whose brain they act. if they arenot moral agents, or are not separate moral agents, they will arguably be incapable ofinfringing the user’s mental rights. in this article, we explore different possible agentialrelationships between the human user and closed-loop neurotechnologies and consider theimplications for the protection that our mental rights provide.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Number of pages | 13 |
| Journal | AJOB Neuroscience |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | E-pub ahead of print - 11 Jun 2026 |
Keywords
- closed-loop neurotechnology
- agency
- artificial intelligence
- mental interference
- moral rights
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Closed-loop neurotechnologies, agency and mental interference'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver