Clustering of drinker prototype characteristics: What characterizes the typical drinker?

B. van Lettow, J.K. Vermunt, H. de Vries, A. Burdorf, P. van Empelen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

Abstract

Prototypes (social images) have been shown to influence behaviour, which is likely to depend on the type of image. Prototype evaluation is based on (un)desirable characteristics related to that image. By an elicitation procedure we examined which adjectives are attributed to specific drinker prototypes. In total 149 young Dutch adults (18–25 years of age) provided adjectives for five drinker prototypes: abstainer, moderate drinker, heavy drinker, tipsy, and drunk person. Twenty-three unique adjectives were found. Multilevel latent class cluster analysis revealed six adjective clusters, each with unique and minor overlapping adjectives: ‘negative, excessive drinker,’ ‘moderate, responsible drinker,’ ‘funny tipsy drinker,’ ‘determined abstainer cluster,’ ‘uncontrolled excessive drinker,’ and ‘elated tipsy cluster.’ In addition, four respondent classes were identified. Respondent classes showed differences in their focus on specific adjective clusters. Classes could be labelled ‘focus-on-control class,’ ‘focus-on-hedonism class,’ ‘contrasting-extremes-prototypes class,’ and ‘focus-on-elation class.’ Respondent classes differed in gender, educational level and drinking behaviour. The results underscore the importance to differentiate between various prototypes and in prototype adjectives among young adults: subgroup differences in prototype salience and relevance are possibly due to differences in adjective labelling. The results provide insights into explaining differences in drinking behaviour and could potentially be used to target and tailor interventions aimed at lowering alcohol consumption among young adults via prototype alteration.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)382-399
JournalBritish Journal of Psychology
Volume104
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2013

Fingerprint

Cluster Analysis
Young Adult
Drinking Behavior
Alcohol Drinking
Surveys and Questionnaires
Prototype
Adjective

Cite this

van Lettow, B. ; Vermunt, J.K. ; de Vries, H. ; Burdorf, A. ; van Empelen, P. / Clustering of drinker prototype characteristics : What characterizes the typical drinker?. In: British Journal of Psychology. 2013 ; Vol. 104, No. 3. pp. 382-399.
@article{30d70b3596764e10afd482473afb637d,
title = "Clustering of drinker prototype characteristics: What characterizes the typical drinker?",
abstract = "Prototypes (social images) have been shown to influence behaviour, which is likely to depend on the type of image. Prototype evaluation is based on (un)desirable characteristics related to that image. By an elicitation procedure we examined which adjectives are attributed to specific drinker prototypes. In total 149 young Dutch adults (18–25 years of age) provided adjectives for five drinker prototypes: abstainer, moderate drinker, heavy drinker, tipsy, and drunk person. Twenty-three unique adjectives were found. Multilevel latent class cluster analysis revealed six adjective clusters, each with unique and minor overlapping adjectives: ‘negative, excessive drinker,’ ‘moderate, responsible drinker,’ ‘funny tipsy drinker,’ ‘determined abstainer cluster,’ ‘uncontrolled excessive drinker,’ and ‘elated tipsy cluster.’ In addition, four respondent classes were identified. Respondent classes showed differences in their focus on specific adjective clusters. Classes could be labelled ‘focus-on-control class,’ ‘focus-on-hedonism class,’ ‘contrasting-extremes-prototypes class,’ and ‘focus-on-elation class.’ Respondent classes differed in gender, educational level and drinking behaviour. The results underscore the importance to differentiate between various prototypes and in prototype adjectives among young adults: subgroup differences in prototype salience and relevance are possibly due to differences in adjective labelling. The results provide insights into explaining differences in drinking behaviour and could potentially be used to target and tailor interventions aimed at lowering alcohol consumption among young adults via prototype alteration.",
author = "{van Lettow}, B. and J.K. Vermunt and {de Vries}, H. and A. Burdorf and {van Empelen}, P.",
year = "2013",
doi = "10.1111/bjop.12000",
language = "English",
volume = "104",
pages = "382--399",
journal = "British Journal of Psychology",
issn = "0007-1269",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "3",

}

Clustering of drinker prototype characteristics : What characterizes the typical drinker? / van Lettow, B.; Vermunt, J.K.; de Vries, H.; Burdorf, A.; van Empelen, P.

In: British Journal of Psychology, Vol. 104, No. 3, 2013, p. 382-399.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Clustering of drinker prototype characteristics

T2 - What characterizes the typical drinker?

AU - van Lettow, B.

AU - Vermunt, J.K.

AU - de Vries, H.

AU - Burdorf, A.

AU - van Empelen, P.

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - Prototypes (social images) have been shown to influence behaviour, which is likely to depend on the type of image. Prototype evaluation is based on (un)desirable characteristics related to that image. By an elicitation procedure we examined which adjectives are attributed to specific drinker prototypes. In total 149 young Dutch adults (18–25 years of age) provided adjectives for five drinker prototypes: abstainer, moderate drinker, heavy drinker, tipsy, and drunk person. Twenty-three unique adjectives were found. Multilevel latent class cluster analysis revealed six adjective clusters, each with unique and minor overlapping adjectives: ‘negative, excessive drinker,’ ‘moderate, responsible drinker,’ ‘funny tipsy drinker,’ ‘determined abstainer cluster,’ ‘uncontrolled excessive drinker,’ and ‘elated tipsy cluster.’ In addition, four respondent classes were identified. Respondent classes showed differences in their focus on specific adjective clusters. Classes could be labelled ‘focus-on-control class,’ ‘focus-on-hedonism class,’ ‘contrasting-extremes-prototypes class,’ and ‘focus-on-elation class.’ Respondent classes differed in gender, educational level and drinking behaviour. The results underscore the importance to differentiate between various prototypes and in prototype adjectives among young adults: subgroup differences in prototype salience and relevance are possibly due to differences in adjective labelling. The results provide insights into explaining differences in drinking behaviour and could potentially be used to target and tailor interventions aimed at lowering alcohol consumption among young adults via prototype alteration.

AB - Prototypes (social images) have been shown to influence behaviour, which is likely to depend on the type of image. Prototype evaluation is based on (un)desirable characteristics related to that image. By an elicitation procedure we examined which adjectives are attributed to specific drinker prototypes. In total 149 young Dutch adults (18–25 years of age) provided adjectives for five drinker prototypes: abstainer, moderate drinker, heavy drinker, tipsy, and drunk person. Twenty-three unique adjectives were found. Multilevel latent class cluster analysis revealed six adjective clusters, each with unique and minor overlapping adjectives: ‘negative, excessive drinker,’ ‘moderate, responsible drinker,’ ‘funny tipsy drinker,’ ‘determined abstainer cluster,’ ‘uncontrolled excessive drinker,’ and ‘elated tipsy cluster.’ In addition, four respondent classes were identified. Respondent classes showed differences in their focus on specific adjective clusters. Classes could be labelled ‘focus-on-control class,’ ‘focus-on-hedonism class,’ ‘contrasting-extremes-prototypes class,’ and ‘focus-on-elation class.’ Respondent classes differed in gender, educational level and drinking behaviour. The results underscore the importance to differentiate between various prototypes and in prototype adjectives among young adults: subgroup differences in prototype salience and relevance are possibly due to differences in adjective labelling. The results provide insights into explaining differences in drinking behaviour and could potentially be used to target and tailor interventions aimed at lowering alcohol consumption among young adults via prototype alteration.

U2 - 10.1111/bjop.12000

DO - 10.1111/bjop.12000

M3 - Article

VL - 104

SP - 382

EP - 399

JO - British Journal of Psychology

JF - British Journal of Psychology

SN - 0007-1269

IS - 3

ER -