Co-Perpetration Responsibility in the Kosovo Specialist Chambers: Staying on the Beaten Path?

Lachezar Yanev

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

Abstract

This article examines the legal framework that the Law on Specialist Chambers (SC) and Specialist Prosecutor’s Office (the Law) establishes for the applicable forms of individual responsibility at the SC in Kosovo. For this purpose, it specifically considers how the concept of co-perpetration is defined under each of the three separate paragraphs of Article 16 of the Law: the provision that lists the modes of liability and regulates their use depending on the category of the crime they are charged with. It will be shown that the merger of customary international law and Kosovo criminal law as the SC’s applicable sources of law, and the complicated set of rules that regulates their use and interaction, raises a number of challenges when defining the legal elements of co-perpetration responsibility. Case law from Kosovo’s domestic courts, as well as other relevant jurisprudence from the former Yugoslavia and the international tribunals, will be reviewed to discuss the construction of this mode of liability - both for international and for domestic crimes - under the Law.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)101-121
Number of pages21
JournalJournal of International Criminal Justice
Volume14
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2016

Fingerprint

Kosovo
chamber
responsibility
Law
liability
offense
source of law
Yugoslavia
criminal law
case law
merger
jurisprudence
international law
interaction

Cite this

@article{6b1e7c78e0da45e2b9856296ca74bd5e,
title = "Co-Perpetration Responsibility in the Kosovo Specialist Chambers: Staying on the Beaten Path?",
abstract = "This article examines the legal framework that the Law on Specialist Chambers (SC) and Specialist Prosecutor’s Office (the Law) establishes for the applicable forms of individual responsibility at the SC in Kosovo. For this purpose, it specifically considers how the concept of co-perpetration is defined under each of the three separate paragraphs of Article 16 of the Law: the provision that lists the modes of liability and regulates their use depending on the category of the crime they are charged with. It will be shown that the merger of customary international law and Kosovo criminal law as the SC’s applicable sources of law, and the complicated set of rules that regulates their use and interaction, raises a number of challenges when defining the legal elements of co-perpetration responsibility. Case law from Kosovo’s domestic courts, as well as other relevant jurisprudence from the former Yugoslavia and the international tribunals, will be reviewed to discuss the construction of this mode of liability - both for international and for domestic crimes - under the Law.",
author = "Lachezar Yanev",
year = "2016",
doi = "10.1093/jicj/mqw010",
language = "English",
volume = "14",
pages = "101--121",
journal = "Journal of International Criminal Justice",
issn = "1478-1387",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "1",

}

Co-Perpetration Responsibility in the Kosovo Specialist Chambers : Staying on the Beaten Path? / Yanev, Lachezar.

In: Journal of International Criminal Justice, Vol. 14, No. 1, 2016, p. 101-121.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Co-Perpetration Responsibility in the Kosovo Specialist Chambers

T2 - Staying on the Beaten Path?

AU - Yanev, Lachezar

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - This article examines the legal framework that the Law on Specialist Chambers (SC) and Specialist Prosecutor’s Office (the Law) establishes for the applicable forms of individual responsibility at the SC in Kosovo. For this purpose, it specifically considers how the concept of co-perpetration is defined under each of the three separate paragraphs of Article 16 of the Law: the provision that lists the modes of liability and regulates their use depending on the category of the crime they are charged with. It will be shown that the merger of customary international law and Kosovo criminal law as the SC’s applicable sources of law, and the complicated set of rules that regulates their use and interaction, raises a number of challenges when defining the legal elements of co-perpetration responsibility. Case law from Kosovo’s domestic courts, as well as other relevant jurisprudence from the former Yugoslavia and the international tribunals, will be reviewed to discuss the construction of this mode of liability - both for international and for domestic crimes - under the Law.

AB - This article examines the legal framework that the Law on Specialist Chambers (SC) and Specialist Prosecutor’s Office (the Law) establishes for the applicable forms of individual responsibility at the SC in Kosovo. For this purpose, it specifically considers how the concept of co-perpetration is defined under each of the three separate paragraphs of Article 16 of the Law: the provision that lists the modes of liability and regulates their use depending on the category of the crime they are charged with. It will be shown that the merger of customary international law and Kosovo criminal law as the SC’s applicable sources of law, and the complicated set of rules that regulates their use and interaction, raises a number of challenges when defining the legal elements of co-perpetration responsibility. Case law from Kosovo’s domestic courts, as well as other relevant jurisprudence from the former Yugoslavia and the international tribunals, will be reviewed to discuss the construction of this mode of liability - both for international and for domestic crimes - under the Law.

U2 - 10.1093/jicj/mqw010

DO - 10.1093/jicj/mqw010

M3 - Article

VL - 14

SP - 101

EP - 121

JO - Journal of International Criminal Justice

JF - Journal of International Criminal Justice

SN - 1478-1387

IS - 1

ER -