Collaboration of general practitioners and exercise providers in promotion of physical activity a written survey among general practitioners

C J Leemrijse, D H de Bakker, L Ooms, C Veenhof

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

136 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Background: 

General practitioners have an ideal position to motivate inactive patients to increase their physical activity. Most patients are able to exercise in regular local facilities outside the health care setting. The purpose of this study was to get insight into general practitioners perceptions and current practices regarding referral of patients to local exercise facilities. Furthermore, collaboration with exercise providers in the community was investigated, and motivators and barriers for referral.

Methods: 

A written questionnaire sent to a representative random sample of 800 Dutch general practitioners. Descriptive statistics and Chi(2) tests were used.

Results: 

All responding general practitioners (340) recommend their patients to take more exercise when necessary and 87 % say to refer patients sometimes. Limited motivation of the patient (44 %) and reduced health status (34 %) are the most mentioned barriers for advising patients to increase physical activity. When referred, most patients are send to a physical therapist (69 %) but also local exercise facilities were mentioned (54 %). The most important barrier for referring patients to local exercise activities are patients limited financial possibilities (46 %). Restricted knowledge of local exercise- or sport facilities was an additional barrier (19 %). There is little structural collaboration between general practitioners and exercise providers, but when collaboration exists general practitioners refer more often. Positive experiences of patients (67 %), affordable offers (59 %) and information of local exercise facilities (46 %) are seen as important promoting factors for referral. Although 32 % of the general practitioners think that good collaboration would be stimulating, regular meetings with sports and exercise providers were considered the least important for increasing referral (3 %).

Conclusions: 

Dutch physicians have a positive attitude towards stimulating physical activity but referral to local exercise facilities is low. Referral is partly hindered by restricted knowledge of local exercise facilities. Although general practitioners think that collaboration is important for physical activity promotion, it should not cost them much extra time. A coordinator with knowledge of the local situation can facilitate contacts between GP practices and sports providers.

Original languageEnglish
Article number96
JournalBMC Family Practice
Volume16
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2015

Fingerprint

General Practitioners
Exercise
Surveys and Questionnaires
Physical Therapists

Cite this

@article{5ae20218f66548d0b4a9bd2dadfe2f09,
title = "Collaboration of general practitioners and exercise providers in promotion of physical activity a written survey among general practitioners",
abstract = "Background: General practitioners have an ideal position to motivate inactive patients to increase their physical activity. Most patients are able to exercise in regular local facilities outside the health care setting. The purpose of this study was to get insight into general practitioners perceptions and current practices regarding referral of patients to local exercise facilities. Furthermore, collaboration with exercise providers in the community was investigated, and motivators and barriers for referral.Methods: A written questionnaire sent to a representative random sample of 800 Dutch general practitioners. Descriptive statistics and Chi(2) tests were used.Results: All responding general practitioners (340) recommend their patients to take more exercise when necessary and 87 {\%} say to refer patients sometimes. Limited motivation of the patient (44 {\%}) and reduced health status (34 {\%}) are the most mentioned barriers for advising patients to increase physical activity. When referred, most patients are send to a physical therapist (69 {\%}) but also local exercise facilities were mentioned (54 {\%}). The most important barrier for referring patients to local exercise activities are patients limited financial possibilities (46 {\%}). Restricted knowledge of local exercise- or sport facilities was an additional barrier (19 {\%}). There is little structural collaboration between general practitioners and exercise providers, but when collaboration exists general practitioners refer more often. Positive experiences of patients (67 {\%}), affordable offers (59 {\%}) and information of local exercise facilities (46 {\%}) are seen as important promoting factors for referral. Although 32 {\%} of the general practitioners think that good collaboration would be stimulating, regular meetings with sports and exercise providers were considered the least important for increasing referral (3 {\%}).Conclusions: Dutch physicians have a positive attitude towards stimulating physical activity but referral to local exercise facilities is low. Referral is partly hindered by restricted knowledge of local exercise facilities. Although general practitioners think that collaboration is important for physical activity promotion, it should not cost them much extra time. A coordinator with knowledge of the local situation can facilitate contacts between GP practices and sports providers.",
author = "Leemrijse, {C J} and {de Bakker}, {D H} and L Ooms and C Veenhof",
year = "2015",
doi = "10.1186/s12875-015-0316-8",
language = "English",
volume = "16",
journal = "BMC Family Practice",
issn = "1471-2296",
publisher = "BioMed Central",

}

Collaboration of general practitioners and exercise providers in promotion of physical activity a written survey among general practitioners. / Leemrijse, C J; de Bakker, D H; Ooms, L; Veenhof, C.

In: BMC Family Practice, Vol. 16, 96, 2015.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Collaboration of general practitioners and exercise providers in promotion of physical activity a written survey among general practitioners

AU - Leemrijse, C J

AU - de Bakker, D H

AU - Ooms, L

AU - Veenhof, C

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - Background: General practitioners have an ideal position to motivate inactive patients to increase their physical activity. Most patients are able to exercise in regular local facilities outside the health care setting. The purpose of this study was to get insight into general practitioners perceptions and current practices regarding referral of patients to local exercise facilities. Furthermore, collaboration with exercise providers in the community was investigated, and motivators and barriers for referral.Methods: A written questionnaire sent to a representative random sample of 800 Dutch general practitioners. Descriptive statistics and Chi(2) tests were used.Results: All responding general practitioners (340) recommend their patients to take more exercise when necessary and 87 % say to refer patients sometimes. Limited motivation of the patient (44 %) and reduced health status (34 %) are the most mentioned barriers for advising patients to increase physical activity. When referred, most patients are send to a physical therapist (69 %) but also local exercise facilities were mentioned (54 %). The most important barrier for referring patients to local exercise activities are patients limited financial possibilities (46 %). Restricted knowledge of local exercise- or sport facilities was an additional barrier (19 %). There is little structural collaboration between general practitioners and exercise providers, but when collaboration exists general practitioners refer more often. Positive experiences of patients (67 %), affordable offers (59 %) and information of local exercise facilities (46 %) are seen as important promoting factors for referral. Although 32 % of the general practitioners think that good collaboration would be stimulating, regular meetings with sports and exercise providers were considered the least important for increasing referral (3 %).Conclusions: Dutch physicians have a positive attitude towards stimulating physical activity but referral to local exercise facilities is low. Referral is partly hindered by restricted knowledge of local exercise facilities. Although general practitioners think that collaboration is important for physical activity promotion, it should not cost them much extra time. A coordinator with knowledge of the local situation can facilitate contacts between GP practices and sports providers.

AB - Background: General practitioners have an ideal position to motivate inactive patients to increase their physical activity. Most patients are able to exercise in regular local facilities outside the health care setting. The purpose of this study was to get insight into general practitioners perceptions and current practices regarding referral of patients to local exercise facilities. Furthermore, collaboration with exercise providers in the community was investigated, and motivators and barriers for referral.Methods: A written questionnaire sent to a representative random sample of 800 Dutch general practitioners. Descriptive statistics and Chi(2) tests were used.Results: All responding general practitioners (340) recommend their patients to take more exercise when necessary and 87 % say to refer patients sometimes. Limited motivation of the patient (44 %) and reduced health status (34 %) are the most mentioned barriers for advising patients to increase physical activity. When referred, most patients are send to a physical therapist (69 %) but also local exercise facilities were mentioned (54 %). The most important barrier for referring patients to local exercise activities are patients limited financial possibilities (46 %). Restricted knowledge of local exercise- or sport facilities was an additional barrier (19 %). There is little structural collaboration between general practitioners and exercise providers, but when collaboration exists general practitioners refer more often. Positive experiences of patients (67 %), affordable offers (59 %) and information of local exercise facilities (46 %) are seen as important promoting factors for referral. Although 32 % of the general practitioners think that good collaboration would be stimulating, regular meetings with sports and exercise providers were considered the least important for increasing referral (3 %).Conclusions: Dutch physicians have a positive attitude towards stimulating physical activity but referral to local exercise facilities is low. Referral is partly hindered by restricted knowledge of local exercise facilities. Although general practitioners think that collaboration is important for physical activity promotion, it should not cost them much extra time. A coordinator with knowledge of the local situation can facilitate contacts between GP practices and sports providers.

U2 - 10.1186/s12875-015-0316-8

DO - 10.1186/s12875-015-0316-8

M3 - Article

VL - 16

JO - BMC Family Practice

JF - BMC Family Practice

SN - 1471-2296

M1 - 96

ER -