Comment on "Competition for consciousness among visual events: the psychophysics of reentrant visual processes" (Di Lollo, Enns, & Rensink, 2000)

Gregory Francis, Frouke Hermens

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

Abstract

V. Di Lolo, J. T. Enns, and R. A. Rensink (2000) reported properties of masking that they claimed were inconsistent with all current models. The current authors show, through computer simulation, that many current models can account for V. Di Lollo et al.'s (2000) data. Although V. Di Lollo et al. (2000) argued that their data could be accounted for only with models that incorporate reentrant processing, the current authors show that reentrant processing is not necessary.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)590-3; discussion 594-6
JournalJournal of Experimental Psychology: General
Volume131
Issue number4
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2002
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Attention
  • Computer Simulation
  • Humans
  • Models, Psychological
  • Orientation
  • Pattern Recognition, Visual
  • Perceptual Masking
  • Psychophysics

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Comment on "Competition for consciousness among visual events: the psychophysics of reentrant visual processes" (Di Lollo, Enns, & Rensink, 2000)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this