Abstract
V. Di Lolo, J. T. Enns, and R. A. Rensink (2000) reported properties of masking that they claimed were inconsistent with all current models. The current authors show, through computer simulation, that many current models can account for V. Di Lollo et al.'s (2000) data. Although V. Di Lollo et al. (2000) argued that their data could be accounted for only with models that incorporate reentrant processing, the current authors show that reentrant processing is not necessary.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 590-3; discussion 594-6 |
| Journal | Journal of Experimental Psychology: General |
| Volume | 131 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| Publication status | Published - Dec 2002 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Keywords
- Attention
- Computer Simulation
- Humans
- Models, Psychological
- Orientation
- Pattern Recognition, Visual
- Perceptual Masking
- Psychophysics
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Comment on "Competition for consciousness among visual events: the psychophysics of reentrant visual processes" (Di Lollo, Enns, & Rensink, 2000)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver