Abstract
This paper presents an experimental study of common consequence effects in binary choice, willingness-to-pay (WTP) elicitation, and willingness-to-accept (WTA) elicitation. We find strong evidence in favor of the fanning out hypothesis (Machina, Econometrica 50:277–323, 1982) for both WTP and WTA. In contrast, the choice data do not show a clear pattern of violations in the absence of certainty effects. Our results underline the relevance of differences between pricing and choice tasks, and their implications for models of decision making under risk.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 1-7 |
Journal | Theory and Decision |
Volume | 76 |
Issue number | 1 |
Early online date | 4 Jan 2013 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Jan 2014 |
Keywords
- Common consequence effects
- fanning out
- WTP
- WTA
- cancelation