Community, Pluralism and Individualistic Pursuits: A Defence of Why Not Socialism?

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

Abstract

Is socialism morally preferable to free market capitalism? G. A. Cohen (2009) has argued that even when the economic inequalities produced by free markets are not the result of injustice, they nevertheless ought to be avoided because they are community undermining. As free markets inevitably lead to economic inequalities and Socialism does not, Socialism is morally preferable. This argument has been the subject of recent criticism. Chad Van Schoelandt (2014) argues that it depends on a conception of community that is incompatible with pluralism while Richard Miller (2010) argues that it rules out individualistic pursuits. I will show that both of these objections rest upon a misreading of Cohen’s argument.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)57-73
Number of pages16
JournalSocial Theory and Practice
Volume42
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2016

Fingerprint

Cultural Diversity
Chad

Keywords

  • Socialism
  • Political Philosophy
  • egalitarianism

Cite this

@article{27e0703cd5b3439794b5c26feae7d310,
title = "Community, Pluralism and Individualistic Pursuits: A Defence of Why Not Socialism?",
abstract = "Is socialism morally preferable to free market capitalism? G. A. Cohen (2009) has argued that even when the economic inequalities produced by free markets are not the result of injustice, they nevertheless ought to be avoided because they are community undermining. As free markets inevitably lead to economic inequalities and Socialism does not, Socialism is morally preferable. This argument has been the subject of recent criticism. Chad Van Schoelandt (2014) argues that it depends on a conception of community that is incompatible with pluralism while Richard Miller (2010) argues that it rules out individualistic pursuits. I will show that both of these objections rest upon a misreading of Cohen’s argument.",
keywords = "Socialism, Political Philosophy , egalitarianism",
author = "Alfred Archer",
year = "2016",
month = "1",
doi = "10.5840/soctheorpract20164213",
language = "English",
volume = "42",
pages = "57--73",
journal = "Social Theory and Practice",
issn = "0037-802X",
publisher = "Florida State University",
number = "1",

}

Community, Pluralism and Individualistic Pursuits : A Defence of Why Not Socialism? / Archer, Alfred.

In: Social Theory and Practice , Vol. 42, No. 1, 01.2016, p. 57-73.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Community, Pluralism and Individualistic Pursuits

T2 - A Defence of Why Not Socialism?

AU - Archer, Alfred

PY - 2016/1

Y1 - 2016/1

N2 - Is socialism morally preferable to free market capitalism? G. A. Cohen (2009) has argued that even when the economic inequalities produced by free markets are not the result of injustice, they nevertheless ought to be avoided because they are community undermining. As free markets inevitably lead to economic inequalities and Socialism does not, Socialism is morally preferable. This argument has been the subject of recent criticism. Chad Van Schoelandt (2014) argues that it depends on a conception of community that is incompatible with pluralism while Richard Miller (2010) argues that it rules out individualistic pursuits. I will show that both of these objections rest upon a misreading of Cohen’s argument.

AB - Is socialism morally preferable to free market capitalism? G. A. Cohen (2009) has argued that even when the economic inequalities produced by free markets are not the result of injustice, they nevertheless ought to be avoided because they are community undermining. As free markets inevitably lead to economic inequalities and Socialism does not, Socialism is morally preferable. This argument has been the subject of recent criticism. Chad Van Schoelandt (2014) argues that it depends on a conception of community that is incompatible with pluralism while Richard Miller (2010) argues that it rules out individualistic pursuits. I will show that both of these objections rest upon a misreading of Cohen’s argument.

KW - Socialism

KW - Political Philosophy

KW - egalitarianism

U2 - 10.5840/soctheorpract20164213

DO - 10.5840/soctheorpract20164213

M3 - Article

VL - 42

SP - 57

EP - 73

JO - Social Theory and Practice

JF - Social Theory and Practice

SN - 0037-802X

IS - 1

ER -