Comparing Descriptive Statistics for Retrospective Studies From One-per-Minute and One-per-Second Data

Hylke H Salverda, Janneke Dekker, Ruben S G M Witlox, Peter A Dargaville, Steffen Pauws, Arjan B Te Pas

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

    1 Citation (Scopus)

    Abstract

    BACKGROUND: Large amounts of data are collected in neonatal intensive care units, which could be used for research. It is unclear whether these data, usually sampled at a lower frequency, are sufficient for retrospective studies. We investigated what to expect when using one-per-minute data for descriptive statistics.

    METHODS: One-per-second inspiratory oxygen and saturation were processed to one-per-minute data and compared, on average, standard deviation, target range time, hypoxia, days of supplemental oxygen, and missing signal.

    RESULTS: Outcomes calculated from data recordings (one-per-minute = 92, one-per-second = 92) showed very little to no difference. Sub analyses of recordings under 100 and 200 h showed no difference.

    CONCLUSION: In our study, descriptive statistics of one-per-minute data were comparable to one-per-second and could be used for retrospective analyses. Comparable routinely collected one-per-minute data could be used to develop algorithms or find associations, retrospectively.

    Original languageEnglish
    Article number845378
    Pages (from-to)845378
    Number of pages4
    JournalFrontiers in Pediatrics
    Volume10
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 12 May 2022

    Keywords

    • data
    • methodology
    • neonatology
    • retrospective
    • technology

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Comparing Descriptive Statistics for Retrospective Studies From One-per-Minute and One-per-Second Data'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this