TY - JOUR
T1 - Comparison of the Accuracy of the 7-Item HADS Depression Subscale and 14-Item Total HADS for Screening for Major Depression
T2 - A Systematic Review and Individual Participant Data Meta-Analysis
AU - DEPRESsion Screening Data (DEPRESSD) HADS Group
AU - Wu, Yin
AU - Levis, Brooke
AU - Daray, Federico M.
AU - Ioannidis, John P. A.
AU - Patten, Scott B.
AU - Cuijpers, Pim
AU - Ziegelstein, Roy C.
AU - Gilbody, Simon
AU - Fischer, Felix H.
AU - Fan, Suiqiong
AU - Sun, Ying
AU - He, Chen
AU - Krishnan, Ankur
AU - Neupane, Dipika
AU - Bhandari, Parash Mani
AU - Negeri, Zelalem
AU - Riehm, Kira E.
AU - Rice, Danielle B.
AU - Azar, Marleine
AU - Yan, Xin Wei
AU - Imran, Mahrukh
AU - Chiovitti, Matthew J.
AU - Boruff, Jill T.
AU - McMillan, Dean
AU - Kloda, Lorie A.
AU - Markham, Sarah
AU - Henry, Melissa
AU - Ismail, Zahinoor
AU - Loiselle, Carmen G.
AU - Mitchell, Nicholas D.
AU - Al-Adawi, Samir
AU - Beck, Kevin R.
AU - Beraldi, Anna
AU - Bernstein, Charles N.
AU - Boye, Birgitte
AU - Buel-Drabe, Natalie
AU - Bunevicius, Adomas
AU - Can, Ceyhun
AU - Carter, Gregory
AU - Chen, Chih-Ken
AU - Cheung, Gary
AU - Clover, Kerrie
AU - Conroy, Ronan M.
AU - Costa-Requena, Gema
AU - Cukor, Daniel
AU - Dabscheck, Eli
AU - De Souza, Jennifer
AU - Downing, Marina
AU - Feinstein, Anthony
AU - Schellekens, Melanie P. J.
PY - 2023
Y1 - 2023
N2 - The seven-item Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale Depression subscale (HADS-D) and the total score of the 14-item HADS (HADS-T) are both used for major depression screening. Compared to the HADS-D, the HADS-T includes anxiety items and requires more time to complete. We compared the screening accuracy of the HADS-D and HADS-T for major depression detection. We conducted an individual participant data meta-analysis and fit bivariate random effects models to assess diagnostic accuracy among participants with both HADS-D and HADS-T scores. We identified optimal cutoffs, estimated sensitivity and specificity with 95% confidence intervals, and compared screening accuracy across paired cutoffs via two-stage and individual-level models. We used a 0.05 equivalence margin to assess equivalency in sensitivity and specificity. 20,700 participants (2,285 major depression cases) from 98 studies were included. Cutoffs of >= 7 for the HADS-D (sensitivity 0.79 [0.75, 0.83], specificity 0.78 [0.75, 0.80]) and >= 15 for the HADS-T (sensitivity 0.79 [0.76, 0.82], specificity 0.81 [0.78, 0.83]) minimized the distance to the top-left corner of the receiver operating characteristic curve. Across all sets of paired cutoffs evaluated, differences of sensitivity between HADS-T and HADS-D ranged from -0.05 to 0.01 (0.00 at paired optimal cutoffs), and differences of specificity were within 0.03 for all cutoffs (0.02-0.03). The pattern was similar among outpatients, although the HADS-T was slightly (not nonequivalently) more specific among inpatients. The accuracy of HADS-T was equivalent to the HADS-D for detecting major depression. In most settings, the shorter HADS-D would be preferred.Public Significance Statement The present study suggests that the accuracy of 14-item Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS-D) and the seven-item HADS Depression subscale (HADS-D) are equivalent for detecting major depression. Using the seven-item HADS-D for depression screening instead of the full 14-item HADS-T has minimal influence on performance of the measure but would reduce patient and participant burden in most clinical and research settings.
AB - The seven-item Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale Depression subscale (HADS-D) and the total score of the 14-item HADS (HADS-T) are both used for major depression screening. Compared to the HADS-D, the HADS-T includes anxiety items and requires more time to complete. We compared the screening accuracy of the HADS-D and HADS-T for major depression detection. We conducted an individual participant data meta-analysis and fit bivariate random effects models to assess diagnostic accuracy among participants with both HADS-D and HADS-T scores. We identified optimal cutoffs, estimated sensitivity and specificity with 95% confidence intervals, and compared screening accuracy across paired cutoffs via two-stage and individual-level models. We used a 0.05 equivalence margin to assess equivalency in sensitivity and specificity. 20,700 participants (2,285 major depression cases) from 98 studies were included. Cutoffs of >= 7 for the HADS-D (sensitivity 0.79 [0.75, 0.83], specificity 0.78 [0.75, 0.80]) and >= 15 for the HADS-T (sensitivity 0.79 [0.76, 0.82], specificity 0.81 [0.78, 0.83]) minimized the distance to the top-left corner of the receiver operating characteristic curve. Across all sets of paired cutoffs evaluated, differences of sensitivity between HADS-T and HADS-D ranged from -0.05 to 0.01 (0.00 at paired optimal cutoffs), and differences of specificity were within 0.03 for all cutoffs (0.02-0.03). The pattern was similar among outpatients, although the HADS-T was slightly (not nonequivalently) more specific among inpatients. The accuracy of HADS-T was equivalent to the HADS-D for detecting major depression. In most settings, the shorter HADS-D would be preferred.Public Significance Statement The present study suggests that the accuracy of 14-item Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS-D) and the seven-item HADS Depression subscale (HADS-D) are equivalent for detecting major depression. Using the seven-item HADS-D for depression screening instead of the full 14-item HADS-T has minimal influence on performance of the measure but would reduce patient and participant burden in most clinical and research settings.
KW - Hads-d
KW - Hads-t
KW - Depression screening
KW - Diagnostic accuracy
KW - Individual participant data meta-analysis
UR - https://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=wosstart_imp_pure20230417&SrcAuth=WosAPI&KeyUT=WOS:000928309800001&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=WOS_CPL
U2 - 10.1037/pas0001181
DO - 10.1037/pas0001181
M3 - Review article
C2 - 36689386
SN - 1040-3590
VL - 35
SP - 95
EP - 114
JO - Psychological Assessment
JF - Psychological Assessment
IS - 2
ER -