Competition and quality indicators in the health care sector: Empirical evidence from the Dutch hospital sector

Ramsis Croes, Yvonne Krabbe, Misja Mikkers

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

Abstract

There is much debate about the effect of competition in healthcare and especially the effect of competition on the quality of healthcare, although empirical evidence on this subject is mixed. The Netherlands provides an interesting case in this debate. The Dutch system could be characterized as a system involving managed competition and mandatory healthcare insurance. Information about the quality of care provided by hospitals has been publicly available since 2008. In this paper, we evaluate the relationship between quality scores for three diagnosis groups and the market power indicators of hospitals. We estimate the impact of competition on quality in an environment of liberalized pricing. For this research, we used unique price and production data relating to three diagnosis groups (cataract, adenoid and tonsils, bladder tumor) produced by Dutch hospitals in the period 2008–2011. We also used the quality indicators relating to these diagnosis groups. We reveal a negative relationship between market share and quality score for two of the three diagnosis groups studied, meaning that hospitals in competitive markets have better quality scores than those in concentrated markets. We therefore conclude that more competition is associated with higher quality scores.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)5-19
JournalThe European Journal of Health Economics
Volume19
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2018

Fingerprint

Health Care Sector
Managed Competition
Delivery of Health Care
Adenoids
Netherlands
Quality indicators
Healthcare
Empirical evidence

Keywords

  • competition
  • quality
  • hospitals
  • market structure

Cite this

@article{cf1fdd4b9dce4324a2cef170b7a93729,
title = "Competition and quality indicators in the health care sector: Empirical evidence from the Dutch hospital sector",
abstract = "There is much debate about the effect of competition in healthcare and especially the effect of competition on the quality of healthcare, although empirical evidence on this subject is mixed. The Netherlands provides an interesting case in this debate. The Dutch system could be characterized as a system involving managed competition and mandatory healthcare insurance. Information about the quality of care provided by hospitals has been publicly available since 2008. In this paper, we evaluate the relationship between quality scores for three diagnosis groups and the market power indicators of hospitals. We estimate the impact of competition on quality in an environment of liberalized pricing. For this research, we used unique price and production data relating to three diagnosis groups (cataract, adenoid and tonsils, bladder tumor) produced by Dutch hospitals in the period 2008–2011. We also used the quality indicators relating to these diagnosis groups. We reveal a negative relationship between market share and quality score for two of the three diagnosis groups studied, meaning that hospitals in competitive markets have better quality scores than those in concentrated markets. We therefore conclude that more competition is associated with higher quality scores.",
keywords = "competition, quality, hospitals, market structure",
author = "Ramsis Croes and Yvonne Krabbe and Misja Mikkers",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s10198-016-0862-6",
language = "English",
volume = "19",
pages = "5--19",
journal = "The European Journal of Health Economics",
issn = "1618-7598",
publisher = "Springer Verlag",
number = "1",

}

Competition and quality indicators in the health care sector : Empirical evidence from the Dutch hospital sector. / Croes, Ramsis; Krabbe, Yvonne; Mikkers, Misja.

In: The European Journal of Health Economics, Vol. 19, No. 1, 01.2018, p. 5-19.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Competition and quality indicators in the health care sector

T2 - Empirical evidence from the Dutch hospital sector

AU - Croes, Ramsis

AU - Krabbe, Yvonne

AU - Mikkers, Misja

PY - 2018/1

Y1 - 2018/1

N2 - There is much debate about the effect of competition in healthcare and especially the effect of competition on the quality of healthcare, although empirical evidence on this subject is mixed. The Netherlands provides an interesting case in this debate. The Dutch system could be characterized as a system involving managed competition and mandatory healthcare insurance. Information about the quality of care provided by hospitals has been publicly available since 2008. In this paper, we evaluate the relationship between quality scores for three diagnosis groups and the market power indicators of hospitals. We estimate the impact of competition on quality in an environment of liberalized pricing. For this research, we used unique price and production data relating to three diagnosis groups (cataract, adenoid and tonsils, bladder tumor) produced by Dutch hospitals in the period 2008–2011. We also used the quality indicators relating to these diagnosis groups. We reveal a negative relationship between market share and quality score for two of the three diagnosis groups studied, meaning that hospitals in competitive markets have better quality scores than those in concentrated markets. We therefore conclude that more competition is associated with higher quality scores.

AB - There is much debate about the effect of competition in healthcare and especially the effect of competition on the quality of healthcare, although empirical evidence on this subject is mixed. The Netherlands provides an interesting case in this debate. The Dutch system could be characterized as a system involving managed competition and mandatory healthcare insurance. Information about the quality of care provided by hospitals has been publicly available since 2008. In this paper, we evaluate the relationship between quality scores for three diagnosis groups and the market power indicators of hospitals. We estimate the impact of competition on quality in an environment of liberalized pricing. For this research, we used unique price and production data relating to three diagnosis groups (cataract, adenoid and tonsils, bladder tumor) produced by Dutch hospitals in the period 2008–2011. We also used the quality indicators relating to these diagnosis groups. We reveal a negative relationship between market share and quality score for two of the three diagnosis groups studied, meaning that hospitals in competitive markets have better quality scores than those in concentrated markets. We therefore conclude that more competition is associated with higher quality scores.

KW - competition

KW - quality

KW - hospitals

KW - market structure

U2 - 10.1007/s10198-016-0862-6

DO - 10.1007/s10198-016-0862-6

M3 - Article

VL - 19

SP - 5

EP - 19

JO - The European Journal of Health Economics

JF - The European Journal of Health Economics

SN - 1618-7598

IS - 1

ER -