Competition soft law in French and German courts

A challenge for online sales bans only

Zlatina Georgieva

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

    8 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    Ten years after the decentralization of EU competition law enforcement, this paper aims to ascertain through empirical means whether Commission-issued competition guidelines and notices (soft law) actually help to enhance enforcement consistency at the national level. This is what the European Commission itself maintained in White Paper on Modernization in 1999. The main premise of the White Paper is that if soft law is to help enhance consistency (a goal central to the current regime), it needs to be treated consistently by national judiciaries within and across EU jurisdictions – a difficult task, however, given its lack of binding force. Therefore, to ascertain the extent to which and how national courts in two select jurisdictions – France and Germany – engage or refuse to engage with supranational soft law, a theoretical framework of ‘judicial recognition’ of soft law is superimposed on a sample of 84 national judgments. While not discouraging, the results show some significant discrepancies that require further attention.
    Original languageEnglish
    Article numberhttps://doi.org/10.1177/1023263X17709746
    Pages (from-to)175-193
    Number of pages18
    JournalMaastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law
    Volume24
    Issue number2
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 13 Jul 2017

    Fingerprint

    ban
    sales
    Law
    jurisdiction
    EU
    European Commission
    law enforcement
    decentralization
    modernization
    France
    regime
    lack

    Keywords

    • Soft Law, EU Competition Law, Legal Effect, Courts, France, Germany

    Cite this

    @article{6db37b39eb7648fc8916ec17a840937c,
    title = "Competition soft law in French and German courts: A challenge for online sales bans only",
    abstract = "Ten years after the decentralization of EU competition law enforcement, this paper aims to ascertain through empirical means whether Commission-issued competition guidelines and notices (soft law) actually help to enhance enforcement consistency at the national level. This is what the European Commission itself maintained in White Paper on Modernization in 1999. The main premise of the White Paper is that if soft law is to help enhance consistency (a goal central to the current regime), it needs to be treated consistently by national judiciaries within and across EU jurisdictions – a difficult task, however, given its lack of binding force. Therefore, to ascertain the extent to which and how national courts in two select jurisdictions – France and Germany – engage or refuse to engage with supranational soft law, a theoretical framework of ‘judicial recognition’ of soft law is superimposed on a sample of 84 national judgments. While not discouraging, the results show some significant discrepancies that require further attention.",
    keywords = "Soft Law, EU Competition Law, Legal Effect, Courts, France, Germany",
    author = "Zlatina Georgieva",
    year = "2017",
    month = "7",
    day = "13",
    doi = "10.1177/1023263X17709746",
    language = "English",
    volume = "24",
    pages = "175--193",
    journal = "Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law",
    issn = "1023-263X",
    number = "2",

    }

    Competition soft law in French and German courts : A challenge for online sales bans only. / Georgieva, Zlatina.

    In: Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law, Vol. 24, No. 2, https://doi.org/10.1177/1023263X17709746, 13.07.2017, p. 175-193.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Competition soft law in French and German courts

    T2 - A challenge for online sales bans only

    AU - Georgieva, Zlatina

    PY - 2017/7/13

    Y1 - 2017/7/13

    N2 - Ten years after the decentralization of EU competition law enforcement, this paper aims to ascertain through empirical means whether Commission-issued competition guidelines and notices (soft law) actually help to enhance enforcement consistency at the national level. This is what the European Commission itself maintained in White Paper on Modernization in 1999. The main premise of the White Paper is that if soft law is to help enhance consistency (a goal central to the current regime), it needs to be treated consistently by national judiciaries within and across EU jurisdictions – a difficult task, however, given its lack of binding force. Therefore, to ascertain the extent to which and how national courts in two select jurisdictions – France and Germany – engage or refuse to engage with supranational soft law, a theoretical framework of ‘judicial recognition’ of soft law is superimposed on a sample of 84 national judgments. While not discouraging, the results show some significant discrepancies that require further attention.

    AB - Ten years after the decentralization of EU competition law enforcement, this paper aims to ascertain through empirical means whether Commission-issued competition guidelines and notices (soft law) actually help to enhance enforcement consistency at the national level. This is what the European Commission itself maintained in White Paper on Modernization in 1999. The main premise of the White Paper is that if soft law is to help enhance consistency (a goal central to the current regime), it needs to be treated consistently by national judiciaries within and across EU jurisdictions – a difficult task, however, given its lack of binding force. Therefore, to ascertain the extent to which and how national courts in two select jurisdictions – France and Germany – engage or refuse to engage with supranational soft law, a theoretical framework of ‘judicial recognition’ of soft law is superimposed on a sample of 84 national judgments. While not discouraging, the results show some significant discrepancies that require further attention.

    KW - Soft Law, EU Competition Law, Legal Effect, Courts, France, Germany

    U2 - 10.1177/1023263X17709746

    DO - 10.1177/1023263X17709746

    M3 - Article

    VL - 24

    SP - 175

    EP - 193

    JO - Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law

    JF - Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law

    SN - 1023-263X

    IS - 2

    M1 - https://doi.org/10.1177/1023263X17709746

    ER -