Competitive Dynamics between MNCs and Domestic Companies at the Base of the Pyramid: An Institutional Perspective

Federica Angeli*, Anand Kumar Jaiswal

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

Abstract

This article investigates the factors underpinning the competitive dynamics between multi-national corporations (MNCs) and domestic companies in base of the pyramid (BoP) markets. We analyze the case of a multi-domestic MNC, Hindustan Unilever Limited (HUL), facing the competition from two small domestic companies, Nirma and CavinKare, in the low-end shampoo and detergent markets in India respectively.

Our findings highlight a fundamental rigidity of HUL By using institutional theory as our interpretative lens, we ascribe this rigidity to the overlap of institutional domains faced by the MNC's subunit, at two levels: 1) the constant search for legitimacy in both the host country domain and within the MNC, which requires the concurrent adherence to local policies and to practices institutionalized within the MNC; and, 2) the simultaneous pursuit of legitimacy in both low- and high-income markets, which requires non-consistent actions to conform to cognitively distant social groups. Building on previous work, we interpret these phenomena as manifestations of "institutional dualism." This work advances the current understanding of strategic behavior of firms in BoP markets. Furthermore, it contributes to international business literature by providing new theoretical and empirical depth to the concept of institutional dualism, which emerges as a potential liability for MNCs competing in highly idiosyncratic foreign markets. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)182-199
Number of pages18
JournalLong Range Planning
Volume48
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2015
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • EMERGING MARKETS
  • FOREIGN FIRMS
  • MULTINATIONAL-CORPORATION
  • STRATEGIC ALLIANCES
  • BUSINESS
  • SUBSIDIARIES
  • ORGANIZATION
  • LEGITIMACY
  • ENTERPRISE
  • LIABILITY

Cite this

@article{2b24661bb74c45999e557dc8b324cd21,
title = "Competitive Dynamics between MNCs and Domestic Companies at the Base of the Pyramid: An Institutional Perspective",
abstract = "This article investigates the factors underpinning the competitive dynamics between multi-national corporations (MNCs) and domestic companies in base of the pyramid (BoP) markets. We analyze the case of a multi-domestic MNC, Hindustan Unilever Limited (HUL), facing the competition from two small domestic companies, Nirma and CavinKare, in the low-end shampoo and detergent markets in India respectively.Our findings highlight a fundamental rigidity of HUL By using institutional theory as our interpretative lens, we ascribe this rigidity to the overlap of institutional domains faced by the MNC's subunit, at two levels: 1) the constant search for legitimacy in both the host country domain and within the MNC, which requires the concurrent adherence to local policies and to practices institutionalized within the MNC; and, 2) the simultaneous pursuit of legitimacy in both low- and high-income markets, which requires non-consistent actions to conform to cognitively distant social groups. Building on previous work, we interpret these phenomena as manifestations of {"}institutional dualism.{"} This work advances the current understanding of strategic behavior of firms in BoP markets. Furthermore, it contributes to international business literature by providing new theoretical and empirical depth to the concept of institutional dualism, which emerges as a potential liability for MNCs competing in highly idiosyncratic foreign markets. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.",
keywords = "EMERGING MARKETS, FOREIGN FIRMS, MULTINATIONAL-CORPORATION, STRATEGIC ALLIANCES, BUSINESS, SUBSIDIARIES, ORGANIZATION, LEGITIMACY, ENTERPRISE, LIABILITY",
author = "Federica Angeli and Jaiswal, {Anand Kumar}",
year = "2015",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1016/j.lrp.2013.08.010",
language = "English",
volume = "48",
pages = "182--199",
journal = "Long Range Planning",
issn = "0024-6301",
publisher = "ELSEVIER SCI LTD",
number = "3",

}

Competitive Dynamics between MNCs and Domestic Companies at the Base of the Pyramid : An Institutional Perspective. / Angeli, Federica; Jaiswal, Anand Kumar.

In: Long Range Planning, Vol. 48, No. 3, 06.2015, p. 182-199.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Competitive Dynamics between MNCs and Domestic Companies at the Base of the Pyramid

T2 - An Institutional Perspective

AU - Angeli, Federica

AU - Jaiswal, Anand Kumar

PY - 2015/6

Y1 - 2015/6

N2 - This article investigates the factors underpinning the competitive dynamics between multi-national corporations (MNCs) and domestic companies in base of the pyramid (BoP) markets. We analyze the case of a multi-domestic MNC, Hindustan Unilever Limited (HUL), facing the competition from two small domestic companies, Nirma and CavinKare, in the low-end shampoo and detergent markets in India respectively.Our findings highlight a fundamental rigidity of HUL By using institutional theory as our interpretative lens, we ascribe this rigidity to the overlap of institutional domains faced by the MNC's subunit, at two levels: 1) the constant search for legitimacy in both the host country domain and within the MNC, which requires the concurrent adherence to local policies and to practices institutionalized within the MNC; and, 2) the simultaneous pursuit of legitimacy in both low- and high-income markets, which requires non-consistent actions to conform to cognitively distant social groups. Building on previous work, we interpret these phenomena as manifestations of "institutional dualism." This work advances the current understanding of strategic behavior of firms in BoP markets. Furthermore, it contributes to international business literature by providing new theoretical and empirical depth to the concept of institutional dualism, which emerges as a potential liability for MNCs competing in highly idiosyncratic foreign markets. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

AB - This article investigates the factors underpinning the competitive dynamics between multi-national corporations (MNCs) and domestic companies in base of the pyramid (BoP) markets. We analyze the case of a multi-domestic MNC, Hindustan Unilever Limited (HUL), facing the competition from two small domestic companies, Nirma and CavinKare, in the low-end shampoo and detergent markets in India respectively.Our findings highlight a fundamental rigidity of HUL By using institutional theory as our interpretative lens, we ascribe this rigidity to the overlap of institutional domains faced by the MNC's subunit, at two levels: 1) the constant search for legitimacy in both the host country domain and within the MNC, which requires the concurrent adherence to local policies and to practices institutionalized within the MNC; and, 2) the simultaneous pursuit of legitimacy in both low- and high-income markets, which requires non-consistent actions to conform to cognitively distant social groups. Building on previous work, we interpret these phenomena as manifestations of "institutional dualism." This work advances the current understanding of strategic behavior of firms in BoP markets. Furthermore, it contributes to international business literature by providing new theoretical and empirical depth to the concept of institutional dualism, which emerges as a potential liability for MNCs competing in highly idiosyncratic foreign markets. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

KW - EMERGING MARKETS

KW - FOREIGN FIRMS

KW - MULTINATIONAL-CORPORATION

KW - STRATEGIC ALLIANCES

KW - BUSINESS

KW - SUBSIDIARIES

KW - ORGANIZATION

KW - LEGITIMACY

KW - ENTERPRISE

KW - LIABILITY

U2 - 10.1016/j.lrp.2013.08.010

DO - 10.1016/j.lrp.2013.08.010

M3 - Article

VL - 48

SP - 182

EP - 199

JO - Long Range Planning

JF - Long Range Planning

SN - 0024-6301

IS - 3

ER -