Concordance between nurse-reported quality of care and quality of care as publicly reported by nurse-sensitive indicators

Dewi Stalpers*, Renate Kieft, Dimitri van der Linden, Marian Kaljouw, Marieke Schuurmans

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

Abstract

Background:
Nurse-sensitive indicators and nurses’ satisfaction with the quality of care are two commonly used ways to measure quality of nursing care. However, little is known about the relationship between these kinds of measures. This study aimed to examine concordance between nurse-sensitive screening indicators and nurse-perceived
quality of care.

Methods:
To calculate a composite performance score for each of six Dutch non-university teaching hospitals, the percentage scores of the publicly reported nurse-sensitive indicators: screening of delirium, screening of malnutrition, and pain assessments, were averaged (2011). Nurse-perceived quality ratings were obtained from
staff nurses working in the same hospitals by the Dutch Essentials of Magnetism II survey (2010). Concordance between the quality measures was analyzed using Spearman’s rank correlation.

Results:
The mean screening performances ranged from 63 % to 93 % across the six hospitals. Nurse-perceived quality of care differed significantly between the hospitals, also after adjusting for nursing experience, educational level, and regularity of shifts. The hospitals with high-levels of nurse-perceived quality were also high-performing hospitals according to nurse-sensitive indicators. The relationship was true for high-performing as well as lower-performing hospitals, with strong correlations between the two quality measures (r S = 0.943, p = 0.005).

Conclusions:
Our findings showed that there is a significant positive association between objectively measured nursesensitive screening indicators and subjectively measured perception of quality. Moreover, the two indicators of quality of nursing care provide corresponding quality rankings. This implies that improving factors that are associated with nurses’ perception of what they believe to be quality of care may also lead to better screening processes. Although convergent validity seems to be established, we emphasize that different kinds of quality measures could be used to complement each other, because various stakeholders may assign different values to the quality of nursing care.
Original languageEnglish
JournalBMC Health Services Research
Volume16
Issue number120
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 6 Apr 2016
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Nurses
Pain Measurement
Teaching Hospitals
Malnutrition

Keywords

  • Hospitals
  • Nurse perception
  • Nursing care
  • Quality assessment
  • Quality indicators
  • Quality of care

Cite this

Stalpers, Dewi ; Kieft, Renate ; van der Linden, Dimitri ; Kaljouw, Marian ; Schuurmans, Marieke. / Concordance between nurse-reported quality of care and quality of care as publicly reported by nurse-sensitive indicators. In: BMC Health Services Research. 2016 ; Vol. 16, No. 120.
@article{aa8e190aa3604ba38e3fc0e560aeb5b6,
title = "Concordance between nurse-reported quality of care and quality of care as publicly reported by nurse-sensitive indicators",
abstract = "Background: Nurse-sensitive indicators and nurses’ satisfaction with the quality of care are two commonly used ways to measure quality of nursing care. However, little is known about the relationship between these kinds of measures. This study aimed to examine concordance between nurse-sensitive screening indicators and nurse-perceivedquality of care.Methods: To calculate a composite performance score for each of six Dutch non-university teaching hospitals, the percentage scores of the publicly reported nurse-sensitive indicators: screening of delirium, screening of malnutrition, and pain assessments, were averaged (2011). Nurse-perceived quality ratings were obtained fromstaff nurses working in the same hospitals by the Dutch Essentials of Magnetism II survey (2010). Concordance between the quality measures was analyzed using Spearman’s rank correlation.Results: The mean screening performances ranged from 63 {\%} to 93 {\%} across the six hospitals. Nurse-perceived quality of care differed significantly between the hospitals, also after adjusting for nursing experience, educational level, and regularity of shifts. The hospitals with high-levels of nurse-perceived quality were also high-performing hospitals according to nurse-sensitive indicators. The relationship was true for high-performing as well as lower-performing hospitals, with strong correlations between the two quality measures (r S = 0.943, p = 0.005). Conclusions: Our findings showed that there is a significant positive association between objectively measured nursesensitive screening indicators and subjectively measured perception of quality. Moreover, the two indicators of quality of nursing care provide corresponding quality rankings. This implies that improving factors that are associated with nurses’ perception of what they believe to be quality of care may also lead to better screening processes. Although convergent validity seems to be established, we emphasize that different kinds of quality measures could be used to complement each other, because various stakeholders may assign different values to the quality of nursing care.",
keywords = "Hospitals, Nurse perception, Nursing care, Quality assessment, Quality indicators, Quality of care",
author = "Dewi Stalpers and Renate Kieft and {van der Linden}, Dimitri and Marian Kaljouw and Marieke Schuurmans",
year = "2016",
month = "4",
day = "6",
doi = "10.1186/s12913-016-1372-z",
language = "English",
volume = "16",
journal = "BMC Health Services Research",
issn = "1472-6963",
publisher = "BMC",
number = "120",

}

Concordance between nurse-reported quality of care and quality of care as publicly reported by nurse-sensitive indicators. / Stalpers, Dewi; Kieft, Renate; van der Linden, Dimitri ; Kaljouw, Marian ; Schuurmans, Marieke.

In: BMC Health Services Research, Vol. 16, No. 120, 06.04.2016.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Concordance between nurse-reported quality of care and quality of care as publicly reported by nurse-sensitive indicators

AU - Stalpers, Dewi

AU - Kieft, Renate

AU - van der Linden, Dimitri

AU - Kaljouw, Marian

AU - Schuurmans, Marieke

PY - 2016/4/6

Y1 - 2016/4/6

N2 - Background: Nurse-sensitive indicators and nurses’ satisfaction with the quality of care are two commonly used ways to measure quality of nursing care. However, little is known about the relationship between these kinds of measures. This study aimed to examine concordance between nurse-sensitive screening indicators and nurse-perceivedquality of care.Methods: To calculate a composite performance score for each of six Dutch non-university teaching hospitals, the percentage scores of the publicly reported nurse-sensitive indicators: screening of delirium, screening of malnutrition, and pain assessments, were averaged (2011). Nurse-perceived quality ratings were obtained fromstaff nurses working in the same hospitals by the Dutch Essentials of Magnetism II survey (2010). Concordance between the quality measures was analyzed using Spearman’s rank correlation.Results: The mean screening performances ranged from 63 % to 93 % across the six hospitals. Nurse-perceived quality of care differed significantly between the hospitals, also after adjusting for nursing experience, educational level, and regularity of shifts. The hospitals with high-levels of nurse-perceived quality were also high-performing hospitals according to nurse-sensitive indicators. The relationship was true for high-performing as well as lower-performing hospitals, with strong correlations between the two quality measures (r S = 0.943, p = 0.005). Conclusions: Our findings showed that there is a significant positive association between objectively measured nursesensitive screening indicators and subjectively measured perception of quality. Moreover, the two indicators of quality of nursing care provide corresponding quality rankings. This implies that improving factors that are associated with nurses’ perception of what they believe to be quality of care may also lead to better screening processes. Although convergent validity seems to be established, we emphasize that different kinds of quality measures could be used to complement each other, because various stakeholders may assign different values to the quality of nursing care.

AB - Background: Nurse-sensitive indicators and nurses’ satisfaction with the quality of care are two commonly used ways to measure quality of nursing care. However, little is known about the relationship between these kinds of measures. This study aimed to examine concordance between nurse-sensitive screening indicators and nurse-perceivedquality of care.Methods: To calculate a composite performance score for each of six Dutch non-university teaching hospitals, the percentage scores of the publicly reported nurse-sensitive indicators: screening of delirium, screening of malnutrition, and pain assessments, were averaged (2011). Nurse-perceived quality ratings were obtained fromstaff nurses working in the same hospitals by the Dutch Essentials of Magnetism II survey (2010). Concordance between the quality measures was analyzed using Spearman’s rank correlation.Results: The mean screening performances ranged from 63 % to 93 % across the six hospitals. Nurse-perceived quality of care differed significantly between the hospitals, also after adjusting for nursing experience, educational level, and regularity of shifts. The hospitals with high-levels of nurse-perceived quality were also high-performing hospitals according to nurse-sensitive indicators. The relationship was true for high-performing as well as lower-performing hospitals, with strong correlations between the two quality measures (r S = 0.943, p = 0.005). Conclusions: Our findings showed that there is a significant positive association between objectively measured nursesensitive screening indicators and subjectively measured perception of quality. Moreover, the two indicators of quality of nursing care provide corresponding quality rankings. This implies that improving factors that are associated with nurses’ perception of what they believe to be quality of care may also lead to better screening processes. Although convergent validity seems to be established, we emphasize that different kinds of quality measures could be used to complement each other, because various stakeholders may assign different values to the quality of nursing care.

KW - Hospitals

KW - Nurse perception

KW - Nursing care

KW - Quality assessment

KW - Quality indicators

KW - Quality of care

U2 - 10.1186/s12913-016-1372-z

DO - 10.1186/s12913-016-1372-z

M3 - Article

VL - 16

JO - BMC Health Services Research

JF - BMC Health Services Research

SN - 1472-6963

IS - 120

ER -