Conducting meta-analyses based on p values: Reservations and recommendations for applying p-uniform and p-curve

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

63 Citations (Scopus)
116 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Because of overwhelming evidence of publication bias in psychology, techniques to correct meta-analytic estimates for such bias are greatly needed. The methodology on which the p-uniform and p-curve methods are based has great promise for providing accurate meta-analytic estimates in the presence of publication bias. However, in this article, we show that in some situations, p-curve behaves erratically, whereas p-uniform may yield implausible estimates of negative effect size. Moreover, we show that (and explain why) p-curve and p-uniform result in overestimation of effect size under moderate-to-large heterogeneity and may yield unpredictable bias when researchers employ p-hacking. We offer hands-on recommendations on applying and interpreting results of meta-analyses in general and p-uniform and p-curve in particular. Both methods as well as traditional methods are applied to a meta-analysis on the effect of weight on judgments of importance. We offer guidance for applying p-uniform or p-curve using R and a user-friendly web application for applying p-uniform.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)713-729
JournalPerspectives on Psychological Science
Volume11
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Sep 2016

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Conducting meta-analyses based on p values: Reservations and recommendations for applying p-uniform and p-curve'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this